Cancer, Fraud, and Bad Biotech!

Edward A. Greenhalgh - 75 York St., Suite 1603, Kitchener ON, N2G 1T5, (519) 579-8320 | E-mail: info@cancerfraudbadbiotech.com

Cancer, Fraud and Bad Biotech 2011

Index of Letters:

1. PRESIDENT OBAMA, USA

2. PRIME MINISTER HARPER, CANADA

Copies of Scanned Letters to PM Harper:

3. OPPOSITION LEADER LETTERS:

4. Justin Trudeau , Liberal MP and the Son of former PM Pierre Elliot Trudeau;

Scanned letter of Pierre Elliot Trudeau Charter of Rights and Freedoms

5. Prof. Vermorken editor of Annals of Oncology

HOW CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY (LEGAL DEFINITION) BLOCKS CANCER RESEARCH AND HARMS SOCIETY; STEALING FROM THE TAXPAYER AND GENERALLY HARMING THE PUBLIC

The website has been updated with the letters sent to President Barrack Obama of the United States, Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada , the leaders of the Opposition Parties of Canada, the son, Justin Trudeau ,of the late former PM Pierre Eliot Trudeau regarding the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the Annals of Oncology .None of this will be of any consequences unless the public realizes that helping is in everyone's best interests. Corruption must be exposed , and only the public can do that. So your help is needed and will make a difference to everyone's lives. To help all you have to do is simply tell someone else about this site and for them to tell someone else.

ASK PRESIDENT OBAMA TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES RAISED !

Who blocks cancer discoveries? Who caused the Wallstreet crash/Great Recession we are experiencing now? Greedy businesspeople/bankers and lazy corrupt politicians. People with names. People who exist in the real world. Do you know who Bernie Madoff was? He was one of the key players, and you can look up Merrill Lynch , AIG etc etc. Bottom line ,real players who were interested in self gain and personal wealth generation caused the recent financial crisis. Some have gone to jail, others received bailouts. Nonetheless , they were real people, not made up creatures lurking in someones imagination. And with the present updates I will name names of people who violated federal regulations and laws so they could experience personal gain and satisfaction and hubris. Real bad people block cancer and scientific discoveries, and they do so for bad reasons, mainly because they believe they are above the law and accountability. Which is why I need your help, the public , to expose them and have criminal fraud charges laid and a Legal Inquiry called. You can do it, and all you have to do is tell a friend who tells another friend : expose corruption simply by telling people about it on the web all over the world.

BOTTOM LINE ; ANSWER THE BASIC QUESTION ASKED OF THE LAW MAKERS AND DECIDE IF FRAUD OCCURRED.

1. Is research described in official government health documents as so bad it is comparable to FECES , excellent ?

2. Is lying for federal funds fraud?

The administrators of the University of Waterloo are criminals , not all of them , just the ones that went along with the CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY. And criminals are the people who block cancer and other scientific research. Do you call criminals who block cancer theories,”BABY KILLERS?” You decide.

What is a Criminal Conspiracy?

Legal Definition : from Boots vs Grundy (1900 England), A conspiracy exists when two or more combine to do an unlawful act or to do a lawful act by unlawful means . No conspiracy is... known to the law which has not for its object the accomplishment of an unlawful act ( not necessarily a criminal act ) or which does not involve the use of unlawful means.

THOSE FORMING THE CONSPIRACY ARE CALLED CONSPIRATORS.

This is quoted from the website DuHaime.org/Legal Dictionary and cites Canadian law. You are asked to look up further details as you please.

Since President Obama is asked to call for criminal charges against Canadian personnel lying for NIH funding , quotes are made from the Lectric Law Library : lectlaw.com; ...makes it a separate Federal crime.. for anyone to conspire or agree with someone else to do something which , if ...carried out, would amount to another Federal crime ,..., under this law, a CONSPIRACY is an agreement or a kind of partnership in criminal purposes in which each member becomes a partner of every other member.......it is NOT necessary to prove the members entered into any formal type of agreement ;or that the members had planned together all of the details of the scheme, ...What the evidence in the case must show is, that two or more persons, in some way or manner , came to a mutual understanding to try to accomplish a common and unlawful plan,...........A person may become a member of a conspiracy without knowing all of the details of the unlawful scheme , and without knowing who all of the other members are. So if a person has an understanding of the unlawful nature of a plan and knowingly and wilfully joins in that plan on ONE occasion, that is sufficient to convict him for conspiracy , even though he did not participate before , and even though he played only a minor part. and “The crime of conspiracy may be of two kinds ,.... conspiracies against the public , or such as endanger the public health , violate public morals, insult public justice , destroy the public peace or effect public trade or business,"

PLEASE VISIT THE CITED WEBSITES AND REVIEW THE COMPLETE PASSAGES QUOTED FOR FULL DETAILS.

I must point out while it is fresh in everyone's mind that former President Bill Clinton may be a co-conspirator due to monies he may have received from business people at the University of Waterloo (and his ethics must be questioned as in the case of Rep. Charles Rangel recently) and outlined in my letters to President Obama of the United States ( and listed on this website) and in regards to the above quotes.

I would also like to quote a recent news article that a “Pakistani-born pilot on a U.S. Terror watch list has been awarded $ 319,00.xx damages from the Quebec human right s tribunal. Please review the news article for the 8th of December 2010 regarding this. I raise this issue because the Ontario Human Rights Commission, particularly Commissioner Rosemary Brown and her fellows who received materials from me by courier , MUST be seen as criminals under the legal definition of conspiracy as cited above. And why I have asked Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada to call a Legal Inquiry into all the wrong doing surrounding this case.

There is just too much detail to put into this opening of the website updates and you must read the evidence in all of the letters sent to the authorities .However, please note in the quotes how it comments that a conspiracy causes harm to the public, endangers the public health and insults public justice , I believe that my case proves that quite well. Yet, I must point out that in the material sent to President Obama I outline the cancer research , its over lap to AIDS, but even more importantly ; how it relates to Global Warming and Climate Change . There has been much controversy about whether or not Global Warming is even real : I explain to President Obama some very serious dangers over looked by many experts. Serious over sights. Let me illustrate the problem, if you see a nuclear scientist come running out of a reactor facility yelling at the top of his voice to run for your lives and he jumps into his car and guns it down the road like hell itself is chasing him, you believe there is a serious problem. In fact, if you have any brains yourself, you will run for your lives too. Unfortunately, the poor excuses for Climate Scientists presenting their data are not so convincing. You do not see them spending their own monies to get government to listen. They do not have their own websites where they beg you for help so to save their children's lives plus their own. No, too often they are seen holding their hands out for government grants , and going on vacations to the tropics and asking for long term mortgages for private homes and their children's schooling. So , the public tends to doubt their credibility. NOT SO WITH MYSELF ! IHAVE SUFFERED BLACK LISTING , POVERTY AND OTHER SUFFERINGS WITH OUT ANY HELP(other from family and a few dear friends). So, people I ask you to read all the following material sent to the authorities listed with this in mind. Your help is needed. Please tell a friend to tell a friend. I would appreciate this greatly.

NOTE THE DATES ON THE LETTERS SENT TO PRESIDENT OBAMA ET AL ARE DATED FROM JULY TO OCTOBER; BUT MY SIGNATURE IS THE DATE THAT THEY ARE SENT BY COURIER. The letters material were completed on the dates but many limitations prevented their mailing until the signatory dates. The content of the letters is what is important, and whether or not any one replies to the issues.

Please also note that there may be a slight difference when the website changes appear and the actual mailing of the courier letters. This , too ,is due to financial constraints and technical difficulties ( I am not a web master ). Therefore , in the future the courier receipts for the letters will be posted along with any replies made by any of the politicians.

See the index listing the most recent letters sent.

Thank you, Edward A. Greenhalgh

2010 Update

FRAUD IS STILL FRAUD AND NO EXCUSE TO STEAL RESEARCH FROM THE PUBLIC!

This is Everyone's Opportunity to Hold Corrupt Businessmen Accountable and Help Make Society Better.

2010 UPDATE

FRAUD IS STILL FRAUD AND NO EXCUSE TO STEAL RESEARCH FROM THE PUBLIC!

This is Everyone's Opportunity to Hold Corrupt Businessmen Accountable and Help Make Society Better.

Dear Reader, when I first started this journey I was a student who believed I could contribute to society by discovering science of medical value. I did just that , but to my complete amazement I found myself in trouble with corrupt people at the University of Waterloo, whose objectives were to develop personal wealth and gain, not helping society. I am a cancer survivor , and , again , to my complete amazement , I found that government, funding bodies, and private individuals, all who claimed publicly that they were looking for the cure for cancer, would rather help cover up lying, and felony fraud than help the cancer research find answers. I survived my cancer (the same as Lance Armstrong's) by rejecting chemo and radiation and applying my own theories : over 18 Cat scans and X-rays to prove it, I am cancer free without the side effects Lance suffered. So why didn't anyone help the research?The short answer is money, the long answer is continued in the courier delivered letters I am sending to President Obama , and PM Harper(to be posted on the website for your consideration).Part of the long story is the corrupt Centre of Excellence program which allows the pharmaceutical companies to gain control of universities and re-direct the research only along paths which promote profit, not necessarily new answers. Part of the new answers is new research which I will never get a chance to do unless the public now helps me over come the suppression and black listing. And, as I will outline, the theory now explains that mankind will be extinct in 50 years unless we act now to prevent the tragedy. And if you help me , and ask President Obama to act ,this may end up creating more jobs rather than costing the taxpayer money. You must see the present events to be as great as those before the Second World War. You are now being asked to become the next Greatest Generation; the one that saved the world from a preventable ecological disaster.

What is conspiracy, and we are not talking about JFK and Oswald , but , rather what it means legally: like ENRON, Qualcomm,Bernie Madoff , AIG and Lehman Bros. And the Wallstreet collapse. A group of influential friends getting together to acquire personal gain who know that there are federal regulations and laws that they need to break so to achieve their goals. Conspiracy to commit fraud is when this group of friends plan to lie to acquire money by deliberately lying; and giving deliberately false assurances so the plan will succeed. Federal fraud is when you conspire to break federal laws. And there is NO statutes of limitations for federal fraud committed against the Federal Government of the United States. And , dear public, if you help now , you will establish a legal precedent that will have far reaching ramifications: especially for protecting the public health and safety, and the tax payers' money (from the misuse of federal programs). This precedent will become a very powerful tool for the public good.

And by applying for the J.C.M. Riley NIH US federal scholarship when the University of Waterloo knew the research was bogus was when the Administration of the University of Waterloo committed federal US fraud. The individuals who are most culpable , who lied in writing with premeditation are the former CEO, President and Chancellor, Douglas Wright, and the Dean of Science(Chair of Biology) Dr. J.E. Thompson. The University of Waterloo had been approached by legal counsel on the behalf of E.A. Greenhalgh and had given them outside expert testimony from M.D. Anderson Cancer Centre (when they had asked that only one competent authority support Greenhalgh) outlining all the flaws in the Riley and Carlson research. They were given simple tests to prove the scientific validity of the claim , but they refused scientific evidence and expert peer review so they could commit federal fraud against the taxpayers off the United States. The research in question is now described in official Canadian Ministry of Health documents ( those are what I'm requesting PM Harper release) as so bad as to be comparable to “feces.” This is not excellent ,as demanded by the NIH scholarship regulations, but Chancellor Wright and Dean Thompson already knew that, but the U of Waterloo research programs were ALL based on the theories now proven false. A great deal of money was on the line from many funding bodies , plus personal reputations; so the University of Waterloo entered into a far reaching criminal conspiracy to commit fraud and obstruct justice. This would culminate in causing personnel in the US federal government to lie in writing: to enter into the conspiracy to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE. A very serious allegation which will be proven in the material being prepared for President Obama. Many federal agencies have lied, ignored evidence or obstructed justice in the US and Canada. You can see much of the documentation in the early sections of the website: many agencies , the FBI. RCMP, PHS, NIH, Ministry of Health, the Ontario Human Right Commission. What the public may find interesting is whether or not there is a conspiratorial connection between the University of Waterloo , and former US President , Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton was responsible for blood being delivered from the Arkansas prisons to the Canadian Blood Service to be processed; helping to spread AIDS and Hep C around the world causing great harm to many, many people. And Bill Clinton also visited the University of Waterloo as President. Was he paid for the visit ? was it conspiratorial? Was President Clinton obligated to the University of Waterloo, and if so, is his wife, Hilary Rodham-Clinton , the present Secretary of State now obligated to this same debt? Does this compromise her service to the people of the United States? All very serious questions contained in the material being sent to President Obama.

And in direct relevance to my troubles was my concerns I put in writing to government regarding the safety of the Centres of Excellence program. At the same time as the Tainted Blood Scandal businesspeople were developing an artificial blood product company, Hemasol. They gave themselves all kinds of phony awards of Excellence (just like the Riley scholarship scam) and had many of the same political and financial connections as Douglas Wright to government and banks. And they also with-held scientific reports (like U of Waterloo and the M.D. Anderson findings from the US funding agency) that showed their product was harming the human test subjects : potential heart attacks and blood clots. They have now gone bankrupt and are hoping to use the same friends as the Tainted Blood services to avoid criminal prosecution . The point being made is that they were able to corrupt many of the same federal agencies ( US and Canada) I am complaining about to keep a dangerous product development going all in the name of profit; not the public safety nor good. Personal wealth and gain at the public's expense. What you have to see is that the same people who have been fighting me are dangerous to you, and people all around the world. They violate federal programs and regulation , and the end goal is simply profit and human lives are of little consequence. You can help to make a better safer society by helping expose the corruption. And I believe these are valid reasons for directly addressing President Obama.

DIRECT EFFECT OF DANGER FROM BAD CENTRES OF EXCELLENCE

1.Ebola researcher crossing border 2009 with samples in car
2.U of Guelph researchers lose deadly viral samples 2009
3.U of Sask. researcher deliberately fails to follow experimental procedures using listeria bacteria Feb. 2010
4.U of Chicago researcher dies from his own plague bacteria 2009

What is needed to be demonstrated is Dr. Xiang of point 3. U of Saskatchewan Who performed listeria experiments WITHOUT bio-safety permits or permission from the university's safety committee has casually stated that what he did was an oversight and he merely forgot to fill out the paper work. PLEASE go to the older section of the website where there is the discussion of Jesse Gelsinger who died several years ago from a viral/vector experiment that was improperly monitored. Any one who claims to be a scientist can't have such a cavalier attitude,or they are bad scientists who will eventually cause great harm. If the public wants to be safe then you must help me bring the criminal charges forward. Just how casual do you think the Dr. Xiangs of the world would be if they knew that they would be held accountable and could face fines of thousands of dollars to jail time. Please recall that NO ONE in the Tainted Blood Scandal ever faced jail time and hundreds of people around the world DIED! It could be YOU! Do you care?

Why should the public care ? If Banting had given up the discovery of insulin may have taken decades longer. Look up Banting and Macleod and you will see that Dr. Macleod tried to steal Banting's discovery and destroy him. Indeed, had MacLeod's handwriting not been so bad, Banting may well have died an unknown drunk in a ditch. However, because Macleod had poorly copied Banting's notes , he could not repeat the work and was forced (not out of goodness,but necessity) to let Banting repeat his work; hence the discovery of insulin. You must understand Banting GAVE the discovery of insulin to the public domain even though some very wealthy businessmen tried to buy it from him. Had Banting done this, can you imagine how many people would have suffered because they couldn't afford the new discovery? That is what the Centres of Excellence program is all about ; the control of all research, even that paid for by the taxpayers. Supposedly, Big Pharma is funding research on universities to spur discoveries. This is false. They fund research on universities so they don't have to build their own facilities or hire their own personnel : it is actually a cost cutting program. There is less and less actual basic research being done in Canada and the US then ever before. I can prove this because I have letters from all the companies stating that they don't do basic research, but only drug development. Please look up Donald Rumsfeld ( of Iraq war fame) he headed up a pharma company where he increased the value to the stock holders by closing down the R&D department: fact. And the new trend is to ship research offshore, especially to the developing economy in Africa. And to this please look up the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the research proposals I sent to them. They are aware that the U of Waterloo is lying but they don't care. And as of 2010 Bill Gates is talking about funding vaccine research for Africa but no details of how the money will be spent. Please look up Gates concept of funding and who eventually owns the research after the researcher develops his own company and has to pay the Gates Foundation back. And who controls the patents for the drug/vaccine. If one were cynical one could say Gates is using a loophole to get his money protected from taxation all the while using it to generate capital. One could say. If Mr. Gates really wanted to save lives in Africa he could immediately pay for all the AIDS drugs that the US government (under Pres. Bush) was paying for but are now ending the program . Many poor Africans are afraid that they will die now that they can't pay for the medication. So , briefly, you can see the Centres of Excellence program has not contributed greatly to new discoveries but more to the control of research , drug sales and wealth generation. A topic which I will expand in the formal letter to President Obama.

So if Banting had a dedication to mankind and would not give up even when faced with corrupt and unethical researchers , why should I? Like Macleod, the University of Waterloo to complete their fraud had to plagiarize my research and blacklist me so they wouldn't be exposed. The University of Waterloo had to suppress research of value to finding the answer to cancer , but they didn't care, the Administrators of the University of Waterloo are only concerned about personal wealth generation and hubris , not the public good . Or ethics , the law or the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (human rights). This was the very motto of President and CEO, Douglas Wright; “to have millionaires walking the halls of academia” (recorded in the public media). But to let people die of cancer? Why not ? They shipped Tainted Blood because they thought it would threaten profits if they didn't : testimony from the Inquiry. And there is the “Evergreening “ program isn't there? The Evergreening program has extended the patent protection another 20 years so generic drugs can't reduce the cost of cancer treatment to cancer victims. A special case of this is Dr. Michelakis of the U of Alberta who has found the drug DCA (dichloroacetate) has the potential to treat many forms of cancers by interfering in in the tumour growth causing them to die. And the drug has been studied on children in the 1950s so has been proven very safe as drugs go. And its PATENT has long ago expired so the drug costs a few dollars a tablet, not hundreds or thousands per treatment. And as of 2008 he couldn't get the 600K$ needed for clinical studies. So why aren't all cancer centres all over the world doing clinical studies (on DCA) to save peoples ' lives? Many cancer centres aren't interested in saving lives but generating personal wealth. Note the above comments on Big Pharma and control of research: how many drugs can you sell if there are pills for a few dollars available? Remember Rumsfeld and generating profit for share holders by closing down R&D, well most cancer centres have Board of Governors who hold stocks in the various pharma companies, so their stock portfolio would go down if they didn't protect their investments : conflict of interest, what do you think? So cancer centres do research on drug development for profit , but not necessarily the most beneficial to the public. You will have to look up my research proposal to CHANEL and the Sloane Kettering Cancer Centre : if you were cynical you could say CHANEL spends less on this than one perfume ad while drawing tons of publicity (small amount of ad money well spent). You can't say cancer centres aren't doing cancer research, but you can say that they may not be doing the most effective or efficient.

EXAMPLE OF HARM BY THE CENTRE OF EXCELLENT PROGRAM

When I first started out , I believed my problem was only with the University of Waterloo and other researchers were interested in finding the cure for cancer and were like Banting. I was wrong. However, I contacted many, many people with research proposals so to find the answer. One man who went on television promoting the Centres of Excellence scheme and how Big Pharma would find the answer to cancer by promoting research, was Dr. Cal Stiller of the University of Western Ontario and was the official spokesman for the Pharmaceutical Industry. I have courier delivered letters , which he didn't answer. Go figure. However, he promoted two of his proteges who had gained control of the Medical Department of the University of Manitoba. He bragged about how they bought the patents for old cancer drugs abandoned by Big Pharma and through clinical studies made them 30% more efficient (more or less). What is wrong with this picture? Plenty, and it actually cheats cancer victims ,and society of new discoveries. You must understand clinical studies to understand how bad their actions were. In clinical studies you need actual sick people to test with the drug and placebos etc. So one group of patients is already designated to die, or not recover . So you have a drug abandoned , and what do you get in return? A new discovery? No. Profit for a company with connections to the government and others so they can sell it to hospitals involved in the program. Worst , you have removed subjects from studies of new drugs (like DCA ) which could have greater effects than a 30% increase in survivability. New discoveries have the potential of eliminating all the older expensive drugs : hence loss of profitability for stock holders( the Directors of Hospitals and Research Centres). The Centre of Excellence program is now proven to have slowed down the discovery of the cure for cancer, NOT speeded it up . See another motive for blacklisting and suppressing my theories.

But , surely, you say, they don't want their own families to die of cancer, or themselves?Therefore, its insane to block cancer research for money. Dead people can't spend money? If they don't have money they can't be rich, have expensive homes, holidays, pay for their kids and grand kids education , buy fancy cars ,and have power over people , can they? So why have athletes taken performance enhancing drugs when they know it will shorten their lives? One, they don't believe it will happen to themselves, they are so special they won't get cancer. Or, like the Endocrinology Society of USA informed me when I told them my work was plagiarized and cancer research was being suppressed, “oh , well, sooner or later someone else will discover what you did.” This is an actual documented quote on official stationary. And even if they do, well they got the money and power they wouldn't have had otherwise. Like the MLB Home Run Championship: its in the books whether you like it or not. Cheaters shouldn't prosper, but , unless they are held accountable , they appear to do quite well. So, sure , they will block cancer research for hubris and money: proven fact!

But a conspiracy to block cancer research? Again this isn't Oswald and JFK, its ENRON and AIG. Businesspeople are just a group of people who control many pathways , and they can easily black list anyone they don't like. Weren't the ENRON people conspiring against many ordinary people and considered themselves to be above everyone else? : THE SMARTEST PEOPLE IN THE ROOM.” Please note that Douglas Wright and his Rim (the Blackberry) proteges were fined over 88 million dollars by the OSC for unethical activity, and Wright was asked to leave the Board for his actions going as far back as 1996( same time as he was blacklisting me and suppressing the cancer research theories ). These are publicly proven to be people lacking in character and ethics : FACT. Please note , besides all the political connections and money at Yale (who , Behrman and Riley plagiarized my theories and committed NIH fraud) The Board of Governors of the University of Waterloo are made up of multi-millionaires (billionaires) from the 11 billion plus RIM company to Trevor Eyton and the huge Brascan Corp (doing electrical grid work for the US government ) to Com Dev ( work for military purposes for the Canadian and American governments; Douglas Wright sits on their board of directors) plus many others. You can see, like ENRON, you have a bunch of rich guys with many influential connections (and have been proven to not to be afraid to use them) :CRONY-ISM suppressed cancer theories to satisfy the hubris of some very bad business people.

But scientists blocking cancer research? Why not? The Nazi scientists did many horrible things, but lets consider Semmelweiss. He discovered that if he got his young doctors in training ( 19th century and discovery of germs) to wash their hands and instruments then mothers would not die of child birth disease ( infections). Did the doctors and medical institutes of the world embrace him? Hardly, they persecuted him. Why, the older established doctors and schools would have to admit he was the authority and what they were teaching was wrong. Loss of prestige and MONEY! There are lots of precedents, but you should get the picture.

The business people who make up the Board of Governors of the University of Waterloo are multi-millionaires so to understand just how bad they are you must consider this : they block research theories of value to finding the answer to cancer. I'm alive because of those theories. Dr. J.C. Carlson , and Secretary Brown of the U of Waterloo Administration, both died of cancer. Dr. Carlson and J.C.M. Riley may very well caused their fellows in the lab to develop cancer : to be discussed in the P.M. Harper letter. But, how many times have you seen on television some poor little bald headed kid with cancer begging you to donate to fund cancer research? Or read some heart tugging story of a small child breaking their piggy bank to donate their little savings to help save their Mom from breast cancer , or Dad, or other family member? The multi-millionaires blocked cancer research and blocked tiny research scholarships I applied for. These are very mean people wouldn't you say? And don't forget , Mr. Jim Balsillie had 240 million dollars to try and buy a hockey team. Please ask the hockey commentator ,Don Cherry, whose wife died of breast cancer what would be more important : the answer to cancer or a hockey team?

Please note Monsanto is at the U of Guelph and this will figure in the material sent to President Obama. U of Guelph has direct links to U of Waterloo and U of Manitoba, and the Canadian and American governments.

So, who cares, after all the research is old and others are repeating it anyways? Well, a small group of people who believe in justice will care, but that isn't many people , is it? Why should the public have cared when people warned about the Wallstreet Collapse , and Bernie Madoff , years before the disaster? People were hurt because no one wanted to help. Maybe you know someone that was hurt. So you don't have to care, but if we don't act now then expect to die. I am sending material to President Obama entitled Prosperity vs. Disaster wherein I out line the benefits of acting now and actually generating jobs and other good things for society or doing nothing , and watching mankind go extinct within 50 years. Ask yourself, do you want to watch your grandchildren die with you , or prevent the disaster and give everyone's grandchildren a future? In the letter to President Obama , I ask him what would he do in the case of a new emerging air-, water-borne disease for which man has no immunity? What would he feel if watched as his children haemorrhaged from their lungs and died before his eyes? What would you feel?

The research to be explained is that according to V.T.T. (the Viroid Thermodynamic Theory on the Origin of Life; see website the Red Section and from the Green Menu: SARS/Mass Extinction for concept) NEW diseases (plural) are developing .NOT one , but more than one, and for the first time in Evolutionary history there will be NO built in fail-safe mechanism mechanism to save mankind from extinction. Indeed; it may be the living planet's defence mechanism to eliminate a dangerous species from killing all life on this planet ! Impossible? Well consider the case of the Great Barrier Reef, a huge multi-cellular complex organism ; it may be dead (EXTINCT) in just decades. And haven't you read that species go extinct, well man is just a species , so man can go extinct , unless we act now to prevent it. What are you talking about? Global Warming? Yes and no. The Climate Change / Global Warming scientists have come under a cloud of suspicion for fudging their data in order to report the results they wanted. People doubt them now. This is EXACTLY like my situation at the University of Waterloo with Dr.s Thompson and Carlson lying and suppressing my research so they could keep reporting the false ( misinterpretations) findings in order to keep the funding. Well, public , I have proven my integrity, and my science is proven correct , and so good my critics stole it. So when I say that the Global Warming scientists are MISINTERPRETING the data and what they are asking will not prevent the disaster , perhaps you should ask President Obama to seriously consider the argument. After all, I am stating it could generate jobs, not just skim taxes off you. And it will require the combined efforts of the world, the Russians, the Chinese, the EU etc. : a large pool of money and resources. I started this update by asking if you wanted to become the Next Greatest Generation that saved the world? Consider this, before the Second World War, the entire world was in an ugly depression (which caused the war and harm) ; where did the money come from?There was no money for Relief and ordinary people, for Health Care etc., but all of a sudden there was millions upon millions of dollars for bombs, and tanks, and guns and other weapons of destruction. WHERE DID ALL THIS MONEY COME FROM? Surely, there is the required money to create jobs and save the planet. There can not be another war, simply because the planet (GAIA Effect ) will not tolerate mankind much longer. Diseases control evolution (V.T.T.) and mankind is becoming an unfit species. New diseases will arise to eliminate the unfit species which threatens all life on Earth. Think about it : you can't survive without Mother Earth, but all life on Mother Earth can do just fine without YOU. Choose life.

This is just a brief up date to say the website still is viable and I still need the public's help. Please come back for more changes to the website when the Obama and Harper material is posted. Thank you. Edward A. Greenhalgh

---

LEGAL ETHICAL and SCIENTIFIC

2007 NEW FINDINGS

Spring, 2007, Lance Armstrong celebrates the SAME anniversary as myself, ten years since our diagnosis with testicular cancer. The major difference is that I never underwent chemo or radiation, nor did I suffer the secondary cancers of brain and lung tumours like Mr. Armstrong. I am ten years cancer free and considered cured. Yet, Mr. Lance Armstrong has publicly stated that so little progress has been made in cancer research and discovery over those ten years, and he wonders why? The answer is simple, Mr. Armstrong when you accept the fact that my own research has been blacklisted for those same ten years in order to preserve reputations and cover up fraud. You, Mr. Lance Armstrong never contacted me. The answer to your question about why is equally simple and is demonstrated in your own sport of cycling. Why is doping so prevalent as it was ten years ago? SIMPLE, the pressure for money, and the fact that many of your fellow cyclists are simply greedy, selfish, bad people. And this is the same answer for cancer research and cancer researchers: many of them are simply greedy, selfish, bad people who put their own personal ambitions and gain ahead of the public good. A simple, but, true answer; people are people whether they are cyclists or cancer researchers, and as such you will find some very bad people doing some very bad things. They must be held accountable.

THE REASON THE CORRUPTION CONTINUES IS BECAUSE NO ONE TAKES THESE PEOPLE TO TASK.BAD CANCER RESEARCHERS LIKE DOPING CYCLISTS MUST BE EXPOSED, AND THEN ADVANCES IN CANCER CURES WILL BE MADE.

WHO SUPPRESSES CANCER RESEARCH? BAD PEOPLE DO!!!

Who corrects wrongdoing? Mr. Armstrong, you made your fame and fortune from cycling, but what have you given back? Your sport is in trouble because of doping, but have you ever spoken up? No, why not? Is it because you cared more for yourself and making money than preserving the integrity of your sport, and were afraid to speak up because you would be BLACKLISTED and lose your livelihood; like I have? You see, Mr. Armstrong, integrity comes with a price and must be paid in full. Are you an honourable man? If so help me solve the answer of cancer, but if you are a coward out to promote yourself, then do nothing, because nothing will be expected of you. Whether or not Mr. Armstrong is a man of honour, is not the point of this example, the point is why cancer research has not progressed in the last ten years, and like cycling, the answer is because there are many cheaters holding the progress back so they can experience personal gain, at your, the public’s, expense. People died who probably shouldn’t have, but others made money that they shouldn’t have. The difference is the law and federal regulations and scientific ethics should not have allowed any of this to happen, but it did. And liars and cheaters prospered.

The questions are:
1.who are the liars and cheaters?
2.How did they prosper?
3.What is the new research and how do you benefit?
4.How do you help?

The issue of liars and cheaters always begs the question of who are you and why are you better than everyone else? Two answers are found in the media, 1. Ramos and Compean, the US border guards in prison for shooting a drug dealer, and 2. Scooter Libby, who, although convicted of felony by a jury of his peers and given an average typical sentence, never served any prison time [his sentence commuted by President Bush]. Did Ramos and Compean think they were better than everyone else, or were they trying to protect the public? As for Scooter Libby, he had friends who were bigger than the public good and the law itself. You only live in a democracy if the law is enforced to protect everyone irregardless of financial status and crony connections, and is not used as an instrument of punitive retribution by a rich elite to inflict their will on the public. In a democracy individuals should not be expected to have their lives destroyed doing the public good while the law stands idly by disregarding the statutes it is supposed to enforce. Individuals are simply too tiny to do what the law is mandated to do when the criminals are billionaire elite who lie and cheat. The law is supposed to provide an even playing field to protect the public good in a democracy; not be an instrument to shield criminals from justice for their own premeditated criminal acts of wrongdoing. This can not be more self-evident than when the criminals are the wealthy elite who have ALL the advantages already going for them in society. Such bad people are the real drain on society and as such must not be allowed to escape the justice they so richly deserve.
Three other examples are necessary (check them out on the web for full details), 1.Rachel Carson, author of Silent Spring, 2. Dr Semmelweiss, and 3. Dr Banting, discoverer of insulin. In the fifties Rachel Carson warned the world of the dangerous misuse of pesticides, and she was slandered. Did she think she was better than everyone else and unwilling to work with good and honest people? No. Semmelweiss was the 19th century doctor who asked surgeons (look up child birth disease) to wash their hands and operating instruments but was slandered and abused by the “PROFESSIONALS” of his day (his “peers”) who refused to examine the scientific evidence that was the basis of his claims. Again they were simply bad people who were too vain and arrogant to do the right thing based upon the scientific evidence available to them. Again, he was more than willing to work with good and honest people who were willing to tell the truth, but bad people acted badly. And Dr Banting discovered insulin based upon an original idea developed by himself for the good of humanity (he gave the discovery away so poor people could afford insulin), but before everything had been finished Dr MacLeod tried to steal it from him. Banting could very well have crawled into a bottle and died a drunk in obscurity except for the fact that MacLeod’s handwriting was so bad and he had miscopied Banting’s notes, that he was FORCED to ask Banting to repeat the work. Who was the bad person?

POINT: Bad people do bad things, including slander and blacklisting to protect their personal gain; while good people need protection from bad people, but do not believe that they are better than everyone else. Good people believe in building a better world. And now I need the help of a few good people too.
What about cheating? Do you consider it an acceptable fact of life that universities (Waterloo and Yale) cheat to protect their reputations even if it means cancer and AIDS research is suppressed? Is that acceptable to you? The NFL in September 2007 has fined the Patriots coach 500 thousand dollars and the team 250 thousand dollars plus they may lose a first round draft pick for CHEATING. The NFL considers cheating to be a serious threat to the integrity and future of the league that they have made this powerful response. In Europe, the car racing federation has fined the MacLaren team a hundred MILLION dollars for cheating. They consider cheating to be so serious and such a threat to the integrity and future of their sport that they had to send such a powerful message. So what kind of message do YOU want to send about the safety and integrity of medical research involving cancer and AIDS and the Universities of Waterloo and Yale? After all, we are not talking sports here, we are talking about your life, and the life and safety of your loved ones. Now you can help expose cheaters and make science safer and better. You can help.

One way you can help is by emailing and blogging people to read this material because corruption does not succeed when exposed to many people. I will be formally asking the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP), based upon the fact of RCMP corruption and the RCMP has asked the OPP to investigate the RCMP, to open a NEW investigation of Douglas Wright and Dr. J.E.Thompson and the University of Waterloo based upon the new evidence to be presented here. There will be formal letters sent to the Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, due to misconduct by the Ministry of Health and his 260 million dollar cancer initiative, and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A Public Inquiry is necessary, so we will see if he is an honest supporter of the Constitution and the law. And the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) because of the departure of Mr. Gonzales proves politics can influence investigations and Yale is now under other criminal investigations, so there are precedents. These letters and subsequent replies will be posted for the public to evaluate and judge. Public participation is an ABSOLUTE NECESSITY; otherwise the cheaters will continue to use dirty tricks to escape justice.

I will be specifically asking the OPP to do this:
1.Ask Douglas Wright and Dr.J.E.Thompson did you SIGN ASSURANCES for J.C.M.Riley for federal scholarship monies that required truthful honest answers? Yes or no?
2.Did Greenhalgh point out flaws in the Riley research that would have proven it false? Yes or no?
3.Did Greenhalgh give you a simple chemical test to prove the research was false? Yes or no?
4.Did Greenhalgh approach you with a law firm and outside EXPERT authorities so that you were aware of the flaws and it was NO accident that you were unaware of the flaws? Yes or No?
5.Is lying for money that would not be granted if the whole truth were told, fraud? Yes of no?
6. Is that your signatures on the application forms? Yes or No?

Then, you the public must compare the following actions to the Conrad Black investigation and trial.
Motive for political interference with the RCMP. Had Douglas Wright been convicted of fraud he would not be allowed to sit on the Board of Directors of companies, and that would include RIM. Wright was sitting on other companies before RIM though so note that. He considers himself above the law and uses his money to ensure that is the case. Even violating civil rights and blocking cancer research. The shame is, he didn’t have to. He did it because he is mean.
You must also be aware I tried everything to leave the University of Waterloo without getting a lawyer or anything, but the university is such a bad malicious organization they just couldn’t let me leave, probably because I would repeat the research elsewhere and then questions would be asked. No, the University of Waterloo acted criminally and maliciously and of their own accord. A public inquiry would benefit society. Please help in getting this process going by emailing and telling people about it.

What may surprise you though is the extent of crony, political and financial, influence that Douglas Wright and others at the University of Waterloo are able to exert worldwide; especially when you consider the fact they are acting to block cancer research. They are able to influence politicians and institutions and scientists in the United States and England. The amazing thing is that they can get people to support a lie when the scientific evidence is openly available for everyone to read and see. Just how safe are you when officials worldwide will support a known lie? Think about it, and then think about vaccines, and new diseases, and why cancer and AIDS research has advanced so little in the last ten years. Many of the researchers out there only exist because of tight little circles of friends who support each other by supporting known lies: Finding the cure is NOT important, continuing the funding is. Why are you donating to cancer and AIDS research without demanding full disclosure and transparency for your money?

WHO ARE THE LIARS AND CHEATERS?

The main criminals are:
Douglas Wright former President and Chancellor of the University of Waterloo, and
Dr.John E.Thompson former Chair of Biology and Dean of Science at the University of Waterloo.

Before going on, another precedent must be introduced, the Ostrich Defense and the conviction of Lord Conrad Black this summer. Please note had Conrad Black gone to trial in Canada he would probably have gotten off, but he is now a convicted felon. And you cannot claim as a defense ignorance of guilt if you are in a position of responsibility and you chose not to act and wrongdoing is allowed to happen. Canada has a worldwide reputation for allowing criminal fraud to escape justice. And again, I remind the reader that Douglas Wright and RIM are under SEC formal investigation.

What criminal act did they do?
They committed federal felony fraud. To cover up the felony to preserve their reputation and the university’s they then used all their political and financial connections (see Scotia Bank and Toronto Dominion letters, for Americans note TD Waterhouse and TD Ameritrade for familiarity of names). They misdirected a criminal investigation caused the Ontario Human Rights Commission members to become co-conspirators by obstructing justice and helping to violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. And everyone knew it was for a lie, and to block cancer theories: because Douglas Wright is so financially powerful and politically connected. Please note, Douglas Wright and his connections with RIM/Research in Motion (Michael Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie) have a publicly known history of political lobbying and influence peddling to try and get their own ways. This was demonstrated by the fact that they had PM Paul Martin lobby for them with the American government and try to block the NTP lawsuit in the US. It is therefore alleged and will require a public inquiry to prove that they also lobbied to have Paul Martin cover up the Ministry of Health wrong doing when I emailed his office regarding UW and RCMP wrong doing. Indeed, a trend we shall see repeated over and over is the fact that the PM’s secretary, Carol Turnbill (sic) told me in a phone conversation that they had been instructed not to help me or respond. See the appropriate emails in previous sections. Note former PM Jean Chretien and President Bill Clinton both visited the University of Waterloo. I sent letters to both of these men stating the importance of the research to cancer and AIDS and the obvious lying that was going on. You will see that former Deputy PM Sheila Copps replied to the same material sent to Chretien but the PM did nothing. Why? It is alleged that he was bought off by campaign contributions made through the University of Waterloo’s many patrons. As for President Clinton, he may claim to want to stop AIDS but he made no reply, but you can see the reply made by his former Surgeon General, Dr.Elders.So we are forced to ask if Clinton really cares about AIDS and the world or just having a foundation to run? Why don’t you ask him? And further, Douglas Wright was made Education Advisor to PM Brian Mulroney. Former PM Brian Mulroney MUST be considered to be a man lacking in MORAL FIBER because you will find the reply of his personal assistant Jeff Foster in the older site material saying PM Mulroney is aware of my situation. Mr. Mulroney (like Mr. Turner) had a CHOICE, and he made it, he turned his back on the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and cancer research. Should such a man, Brian Mulroney like Douglas Wright, be considered a “baby killer ‘? Why don’t you ask him? But one thing is for certain; he lacks moral fiber and is NO DEFENDER OF THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION!!! So, we can clearly see that RIM through the University of Waterloo has a history of influence peddling, and not for the good of society. If there is a failure with servers, then Blackberries may be shut down for hours or a day and there is no loss of life. However if a vaccine is a failure or some other medical procedure/drug is a deliberate lie, then people can be killed or crippled; and remember how the Tainted Blood Scandal was the cooperative effort of Bill Clinton and the Prison blood that the Canadian Government processed and shipped around the world. Now you can see how political and criminal misconduct by people at the University of Waterloo who consider themselves to be above the law, like Douglas Wright, can harm you.

But what crime did Wright and Thompson commit? They deliberately lied (see earlier material sent in evidence to RCMP and FBI) for a federal scholarship for J.C.M.Riley to go to Yale. Riley was a C- physics student that his family and friends wanted to get a PhD and a job. He had no training in biology or chemistry so they naturally put him in a Biology PhD program in Endocrinology with Dr.J.C.Carlson as his supervisor so he could repeat another PhD’s work, M.M.Buhr who had already graduated on that basis, who was also a co-grad student of Dr.J.E.Thompson.And Thompson and Carlson and the biology Department had their entire grants based upon this work. Long story short it was wrong, and a fallacy. None the less Wright had guaranteed Riley the degree and had already faked his marks and other phony UW scholarships so he could qualify for A Yale scholarship under NIH.Long story short, my research proved that not only was Riley incompetent but Buhr could not tell living tissue from dead, nor could she and Thompson understand basic rigor mortis or that genes were more important than any fluidity work that the school was getting their grants for. I discovered the Cell Death Signal Gene concept, which is now the basis for cancer research worldwide. But here is the neat part; Dr Carlson and Riley were sabotaging my research by interfering with my rats. If I mislabeled my samples (in effect hiding them) and leaving out decoys, then the experiments would work. If I didn’t hide them the experiments would fail. Please note I told the University of Waterloo this and even gave them a test to use; put an antioxidant in the experiment procedures and ALL of Carlson and Riley’s research would fail. The University said get one competent expert to agree with you and we will pass your thesis. Dr G.L.Nicolson, then a leading cancer expert at M.D.Anderson Cancer Center supported me. Guess what, UW said you get your experts and we will get ours. And then I had a number of law firms do unethical things to cover-up and protect UW. POINT; UW LIED INTENDED TO LIE AND COMMITTED CRIMNAL ACTS. Proven. Over and over. See earlier sections of the website.
Please note that to try and save Riley’s research, Carlson bought a radioactive isotope (gamma emitter- cancer causing) to prove their theory. The only thing I can see from this is Carlson caused me to get my cancer, AND his own cancer which KILLED him last year. I want to emphasize that in this age when the CDC can’t prevent TB strains from escaping and the British government can’t stop labs from causing hoof and mouth disasters, that maybe the public start yelling at the top of their lungs for an investigation because the incompetence of institutions, and the evidence of incompetence by lax and corrupt government officials who deliberately accept false assurances and cover up lies are a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY!!! The University of Waterloo is such a blatant case that a public inquiry would be a tremendous benefit for all of society; especially since UW has such a wide influence on US and British officials.
I must wonder how many others got cancer from the Carlson contamination? Would UW tell the truth?

CRIMINAL ACT; WRIGHT AND THOMPSON GAVE DELIBERATE FALSE SIGNED ASSURANCES FOR FEDERALMONEY AND VIOLATED FEDERAL REGULATIONS FOR RESEARCH: THEY COMMITED FELONY FRAUD IN PREMEDIATAION AND WITH MALIOUS INTENT FOR PERSONAL GAIN.
Please note Carlson and Sawada and Riley and Behrman (of Yale) and Thompson all plagiarized my research. Endocrinology of USA covered this up saying even if you (Greenhalgh) found research of value to cancer and AIDS someone else will sooner or later find it too!!!!
SO LANCE ARMSTRONG, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT THIS? If you act you will send a message, like the NFL did in football!

ARE YOU GOING TO LET CHEATERS PROSPER? Help me by telling everyone.
So the vendetta is on the University of Waterloo’s part because you will see I criticized Douglas Wright and the CENTER OF EXCELLENCE PROGRAM (see older material) wherein Wright proclaimed that the elite should rule and businesses should be founded on campus with millionaires wandering the halls. No where does he express the concern for the truth or the public safety nor ethics nor integrity: just money. He is a businessman without world concern (note, his answer to garbage build up was incineration, so much for global warming) driven by petty politics, greed and power. And from the Center of Excellence program he was the Chief Mentor to Michael Lazaridis and Jim Balsillie. Indeed, Laziridis credits Wright with deciding on the directions that the early company (RIM) should take. Please note RIM is now under a formal SEC investigation and Wright was named in some funny business (like Conrad Black) with executive payments and stock options. Balsillie (6Mar 07) resigned as chair for accounting errors while Wright (July 07) has resigned from the Board of Directors. I would suggest given the history I have dealing with them that they are trying to evade something (“playing the SEC like a Mafiosi plays a cheap violin”), but that is only from my personal and painful experience.

I would like to put a picture in your mind so you can better understand just how awful and malicious they have been. Early on I was offered a scholarship from a drug company for 5000 dollars, but someone interfered with it. Now consider just how rich these men are. RIM is either an 11 or 40 billion dollar company depending on whom you talk to, and they are supposed to earn 100 million a year each. Compare that to the five thousand they blocked, that is like you going to a kindergarten play ground and stealing 50 cents from a five year old. Do you understand just how awful these people are?
Further, Balsillie tried to buy a hockey team for 250 million dollars. Don Cherry is a commentator for Hockey Night in Canada, his wife died of breast cancer. Please look up the material on the older site regarding my research proposal for breast cancer. Maybe she would not have had to die of breast cancer. Don’t know, I have been blacklisted, but the point is ask Don Cherry what is more important, a hockey team or helping breast cancer? Then consider this, they have so much money it didn’t have to be an either or question; they could have helped the cancer research and still have money to buy the hockey team. Wouldn’t you consider what I have just described as an illustration of evil?

So we don’t lose track of an important issue, it is now an accepted fact that cancer researchers and others lie for money and fabricate their results. A few examples are found in the Norwegian cancer researcher in the spring of this year who was proven to have made up his data at a prestigious hospital .The Newfoundland testing of women for breast cancer and giving them false results with people dieing (tests dating back to 1997; do you think if my case had been made public people would have been more conscientious out of fear of the law?). The NY Times (2005) reported on a ten year investigation in cancer research misconduct at the Stratton Veterans Medical Center in Albany, many unethical practices were uncovered and a criminal conviction followed The German Journal, Annals of Oncology reports that oncology research was shaken by fraud case and as a result they are reviewing all the publications as far back as ten years or more.
POINT: CANCER RESEARCH FRAUD IS A PROVEN REALITY.

I TOLD THE TRUTH CAN YOU HELP ME?

Important fact, a law firm I dealt with told me that the powers connected to the University of Waterloo had said that I WOULD NEVER WORK AGAIN!!!!! And, point in fact, except for my own personal sacrifice I have not. In fact the financial burden and strain they have placed on me is pushing me closer to personal bankruptcy each passing day. I do hope someone cares for the sacrifice I have made, as I never dreamt anyone would be punished so horribly for trying to help people beat cancer.

The website is a work in progress and more material is being prepared but at the moment this section is added so people can see where the issue is presently. However, I ask you read the Donald Drummond letter of the Toronto Dominion Bank (Americans will be familiar with its affiliates Waterhouse and Ameritrade). Mr. Donald Drummond likes to say profound things in the press and during the 2006 AIDS conference he said AIDS was a threat to the world economy. I must inform you that TD has a prominent presence on the University of Waterloo campus. I ask you to read the funding proposal I sent him (see below to to read letter). From the material he IS fully aware that the University of Waterloo has lied and my research has been vindicated, but what does he do? This man who claims research advancements are important to society does, well, NOTHING! I received a telephone call from his secretary, a Ms.Davies (SIC) who informed me that they WERE NOT GOING TO RESPOND TO MY LETTER! So there. What do you think they should have done? Now compare this to the Godsoe letter /Bank of Nova Scotia found in a past section, see the Green menu. Another banker who does nothing. Did you know Scotia bank has a hockey team in Ottawa (Senators) and they sponsor sporting events? Did you know that in the US Fannie Mae is being criminally investigated for their student loan deals with universities? Do these banks make a lot of money from guaranteed loans in Canada, and is that why they have a major presence on campus? Question not an answer.

Letter

                                                                                    Edward A.Greenhalgh
                                                                                    1603-75 York St.,
                                                                                    Kitchener, ON.
                                                                                    N2G 1T5

Ph. 519-579-8320

Email: HYPERLINK "mailto:info@cancerfraudbadbiotech.com" info@cancerfraudbadbiotech.com

09 September 2006
TO:
Donald E.Drummond
Senior Vice President and Chief Economist
Of the Financial Group
                   C/o                                                           TITLE: THE BATTLE AGAINST
Head Office                                                                  AIDS MAKES GOOD ECONO-
The Toronto Dominion Bank                                         MIC SENSE-IS THE TD BANK
P.O. Box 1                                                                   SINCERE OR ENGAGED IN
Toronto Dominion Center                                             P.R. B.S.?
55 King St. W.
Toronto, Ontario. M5K 1A2                                        Do you really care and love your
416-982-8222                                                             kids (your neighbours’ kids) enough to help?

                                                PRECEDENTS: -Banting was mistreated by MacLeod
                                                                            -Salk was hated by his colleagues
                                                                            -Mendel’s Genetics were suppressed 40
                                                                             years.
Dear Mr.Donald Drummond:
            Do you (personally) and the TD Bank really want to help to eradicate AIDS? The title of the letter is meant to get your attention to the seriousness of the material to follow and the depth of my own sincerity for the accompanying request/funding proposal. The serious nature of my documentation has always been open to public review so I am being open and up front with you from the beginning so you know that whatever your reply may be it may be measured for its sincerity and honest commitment. Good science and business must be transparent and open and accountable to the public.

            Who am I? Why should you care? What do I want, and how does it benefit the TD Bank and society? I am a scientist who has had blacklisting problems due to my advanced theories and if you want truthful answers to AIDS and other medical questions, you will care. And everyone will benefit.
            My letter is in direct response to your statements concerning the 2006 AIDS conference held in Toronto, wherein you are quoted in the media with saying it makes good business sense to eradicate AIDS from the world. Did you truthfully mean it? If you did then you will help me.
At the same conference was Dr. Rosenthal (of McMaster) who, from my experience, is a failed AIDS researcher. Salk did not need 14 years to develop the polio vaccine. Banting required only a year for insulin and he was generous in sharing the credit to colleagues. Mendel presented his work freely to an unaccepting scientific community. And Dr. Rosenthal has no AIDS vaccine since 1992 when I wrote him offering to collaborate. If he thinks AIDS is a crisis we can check his sincerity by documenting how many vacations he has given up so he could work continuously and uninterrupted in that same time period. How many? None! If you have a crisis, sir, don’t you give it all your effort and attention? He is a proven failure and you can see my correspondence to him, and Mr. Godsoe (Bank of Nova Scotia) on my website, HYPERLINK "http://www.cancerfraudbadbiotech.com" www.cancerfraudbadbiotech.com; select Bad Biotechnology and Godsoe from the menu. I am alive because of my own theories, while Rosenthal has failed in his work (and so has Mr. Godsoe of Scotia bank; he didn’t meet with me, can you be better?).
            Will you prove insincere/a failure, sir? On the same website you will find research proposals to Merck, Pfizer, the Gates Foundation etc., wherein I talk about new theories for vaccines. Unlike Dr. Rosenthal, I do not fail, and even though blacklisting has forced the most awful conditions on me, I still develop successful theories. So much so, a group of Americans from Bethesda Ma. Only last month proved my theory by announcing gene therapy break through to tell tumours to die. I only proposed this circa
1992, and sent proposals to ALL THE MAJOR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES.
All my scientific colleagues treated my work like Mendel’s: suppressing then stealing.
            What has this to do with AIDS? Plenty! I have always theorized reprogramming white cells to regenerate the immune system. AIDS and cancer viruses are from the same family so what the Americans have done is to simply genetically engineer a personal vaccine; which, if you read my recent proposals to Merck, Pfizer etc., was what I wanted to discuss with them. I did not write down the details because I have grown tired of all the theft and no help from the pharma/scientific community. The point should now be obvious to you about my theories on AIDS and what could have been accomplished with Dr.Rosenthal circa 1992 had he been a scientist in Banting’s mould. He wasn’t and still isn’t.
            Strong words? No. On my website you will see in the Sept. 2006 Summary quotes from Ms.Munro’s National Post article on the bad standards of Canadian researchers and universities. The documentation proves that there are many bad people and practices. Perhaps the best bad example is that of the Nobel Laureate, Dr. Tonegawa of MIT who bullied a young researcher because he didn’t want to compete with her. You are an economist, competition is supposed to drive research. If you are a good person you will understand my points.
            To keep the letter short, it would be better to meet and discuss the proposal in person. However, it is central to understand and accept as fact that the scientific community is in a crisis of a lack of integrity so much so that the Lancet and other leading journals have complained publicly about the lack of independent researchers and bad ethics in modern research papers etc. Such is also true of the AIDS research community. When AIDS was first discovered in the 70s there were no dedicated AIDS journals, now there is a paper industry of 100s. Get my point?
            I am alive because of the quality (not quantity) of my research and theories. My track record for integrity and ethics is proven and can be held up to the light of day. The same can not be said of my detractors. In just six months I proved that the entire University of Waterloo biology department was wrong. I did this neither out of meanness nor malice but because I am a good scientist who reports the truth and repeatable experiments: the job of any good scientist! However, that is not what the University of Waterloo is about. They are about family and friends and personal gain and grants: not truthful answers and this is the same problem with the large majority of the AIDS/cancer research community. Don’t give me the excuse that it is a hard problem; tell that to Mendel, Banting and Salk. And if it is such a hard problem why wouldn’t people like Dr. Rosenthal want to collaborate with people of integrity with new ideas? No, like the Reproductive Community, the AIDS Research Community is in its own integrity crisis.
            Sir, I propose, if you are sincere, that you help me solve the problem. I am offering you the same proposal as to Merck, Pfizer etc., only this time my theories have even more credibility because of the “break through “ by the Bethesda Ma. Research team: theories proposed by me circa 1990 (and documented). I propose that you grant $100,000.xx Cdn to develop the biological pathways for cancer and AIDS under the umbrella of the evolutionary development theory of the Viroid Thermodynamic Theory on the Origin of Life (VTT). To put this in perspective, Canadians recently in Toronto paid $200,000.xx dollars for a seat at a Bill Clinton dinner function. It is really not a great deal of money to the financial elite, especially if the aim is to eradicate AIDS. As with my exhaustive preliminary research I performed at the University of Waterloo I am sure to find answers no one wants because of cronyism and grant protectionism.
            And in a years time I can present my findings, with your help, at the next AIDS conference. And like the University of Waterloo experience (scientific corruption suppressing research and protecting cronies) I can guarantee you results. The most obvious explanation is simply because the majority of researchers are so bad and are falsifying their results (good bad example is the Norwegian cancer researcher who falsified his results in the spring of 2006).
            And like CEO McKinnell of Pfizer, I must ask you, do you love your kids? Do you want the best for your customers’ kids? If you do, then there is only one choice to make, you must help me. I look forward to your reply.
                                                            Thank you

Edward A.Greenhalgh

Additional material soon to be added **********
Work in progress***********

May & July 2008 Revision

JULY 2008:

AS of 2008 there have been a series of “exciting” cancer discoveries announced in the media. Not to take away from the different groups’ hard work, but much of what they have “discovered” dates back to my 1988 Cell Death Signal Theory research sent out as proposals and descriptions to the Canadian and US governments, pharmaceutical firms and research centers in Canada, US, and the UK. These centers have included Princess Margaret Cancer Center (UT, Canada) U of Louisville (USA), Princess Patricia Hospital (Southampton, UK), and the Max Planck Research Institute, among many: even though I was black listed I wanted to help society, and the best way was to put these ideas in front of as many people as possible to speed the research. You cannot just show up at conferences, first they don’t let you in, and then they slander you and block you speaking anyways. So the only choice was to send out the theories so they would get around that way (and so be documented). What the public is asked to understand is that the documented evidence of the research THEORIES dating DIRECTLY back to the suppressed work of 1988. Research blacklisted and suppressed so academic and felony fraud could be committed (and people could die that might have been helped). So, ask yourselves, if the present day researchers are calling these “rediscovered” “NEW” theories of major importance, wouldn’t better treatments be available NOW!!

POINT; MENDEL PRESENTED HIS GENE THEORIES ABOUT 60 YEARS BEFORE THEY WERE “REDISCOVERED”. Researchers of his day just weren’t ready for new ideas; they were bad and selfish who really wanted to promote themselves. I have been black listed and hurt for 20 years now, but the theories haven’t stopped Cell Death Signal Theory has grown into the Viroid Thermodynamic Theory on the Origin of Life (VTT). I NEED THE PUBLIC’S HELP NOW!! How many more people have to suffer so a lie can be covered up? The new theories involve pollution, GMOs, global warming and the creation of new diseases. You think you will die from flooding? More likely from a new disease for which you have no immune defenses. And the documented evidence proves my past theories to right and important. Will you help?
2008 Wake Forest University (USA) reports on immune cells taken from healthy mice and placed in mice with cancer find that the tumours are attacked and the mice are cured of cancer. The granulocytes attack the tumours causing them to disappear.
The BBC news read, “Clone cell cancer “cure” hailed.” The article read that a 52 yr old man with melanoma was cancer free after 2 years. US researchers (New England Journal of Medicine) took cancer fighting immune cells and made billions of copies and put them back in the patient. The patient is alive and cancer free after 2 years. I ask the reader to realize that this theory was explained to the US government over 20 years ago in my correspondence concerned about the academic fraud being committed by Yale and Waterloo universities. Letters to the Public Health Service (PHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) plus the Dept. of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI. To name a few. [see Green section for some of the legal correspondence].

Long story short, why wasn’t this research helped by the very public bodies that are MANDATED by Acts under Congress to promote medical research of benefit to the taxpayer? Why did they CHOOSE to help cover up fraud, thus blocking beneficial cancer research? You should ask them!!! How many people have died over the last 20 years that didn’t have to? Do you know anyone who died of cancer?
PLEASE NOTE a cancer EXPERT at Imperial College in London (UK) described the BBC article research as “pretty exciting” with “potentially wide application.” PLEASE NOTE: I sent research proposals to Imperial College in the early nineties. If you are from the UK you should ask your government why they went along with the black listing to cover up academic/felony fraud? Do you know anyone in England? Scotland? Wales? Ireland? Who died of cancer? Maybe they didn’t have to. You can still help now.
Please note that in 2007 researchers at Max Planck Research Institute published a paper discussing Cell Death Signal theory (go to the internet and look it up), and then go to the Green section of the website and see my letters to the Canadian government and Ministry of Health circa 1988.
Please note that as of July 2008 a Massachusetts University has produced a study of a silicon chip which captures tumour cells and can detect cancers earlier so better treatment options are available. IN THE NEXT THREE YEARS they HOPE TO BRING IT TO THE PUBLIC. That will be 2011. Wouldn’t ten years ago have been better? Please note under Goldman Philanthropic Funding/Culpepper project I discuss research proposals and there is a mention of research being done at a Mass. University. See at the end of Red Section with Merck. Pfizer and Hughes foundation proposals.
What all the above researchers are missing is that they don’t tell you what cancer really is and if they knew that then cancer could be treated better, which is why I still need everyone’s’ help. Cell Death Signal Theory became VTT after reviewing the work of everyone and finding that Conrat-Frankel had said that viruses were the origin of life in 1963. He was hated then but later won the Nobel prize. Examing genes and the rest of my work you can see that genes are basically viroids that have come together in an economical solution to maintaining themselves, and condensing even more complexity, life is simply a solution to store more energy. Life is a never ending replicating chemical reaction. Viruses therefore are the origin of ALL cells and all cell components. These include all cell receptors and hormones. Evolution of virus components has lead to receptors and hormones and the functioning of cells and eventually higher organisms. Hence immune cells are a viroid derived control system. They are programmed by viroid components . In a healthy undamaged cell/tissue everything is in sync and harmony. Cancer disease occurs in response to some type of damage: radiation, chemical etc. that effects the harmony causing out of sync messages to occur or even the gene to come out of the genome to be a virus. This is too complicated for the insert I am preparing here. Longer story short, the virus REPROGRAMS the immune cells not to recognize viruses or tumours as dangerous. In the above “new discoveries” the immune cells from healthy animals simply have not been reprogrammed and see the tumour tissue as dangerous and to be removed. Can you understand the concept? I think most people can. Another consequence of this is that the tumour signals, the evolved viral hormones will be found in any individual long before a tumour forms. Therefore, if you develop systems to look for these peptides, Ring complexes, whole gamut of hormone types but specific for tumours you can detect cancer long before it is deadly!!! Now ask yourselves why no one has helped me? Why has everyone chosen to cover up academic lying, misconduct and fraud? Will you help the research?
The research has ramifications to developing new vaccines and dealing with AIDS. See the Merck, Pfizer and Gates Foundation proposals at the end of the Red Section. But more importantly, VTT is concerned about pollution GMOs and new diseases. Diseases are not parasites but evolutionary REGULATORS. The media has said that the polar ice cap will be gone this year and the Artic ocean will have open water for the first time in mankind’s’ memory. This is absolutely frightening. And we are dumping so much sewage in our waters as to be even more scary. And we have free radicals from pollution and GMO genes running wild, literally. Earth is a living organism, and I just explained that viruses are the REGULATORS OF LIFE. Mankind, as a species is out of control, what do you think is the best way to regulate an out of control species? If you examine models in nature you will see diseases occur to do that. And what we now face, especially because of GMOs, are gene sequences in the wrong places!! And whose genes are these? Mankinds!! See the Red or Gold section where this is discussed but we must clean up the earth or we will die. Extinction. Extinction of species has happened before, usually due to environmental stress, and the present environmental stress is species specific. We may only have 20 years to act. Oil crisis and global warming is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg, new mankind-programmed diseases will be the ultimate threat. Will you help? This is just a condensed addition to the website. I will now finish the letter to PM Harper, and include material to Governor Arnold Scwharznegger of California (since The “Guvenator” is concerned about the environment and promoting Biotech and my concerns are about BAD biotech. Also Canada and California has entered into a 100 million dollar biotech program collaboration.). Thank you. I look forward to any response the public may make. E.A.Greenhalgh

MAY 2008:

The QUESTION remains unanswered; Is lying for money fraud? And can research described in derogatory terms by official federal documents be called excellent? And if the government will accept lies and cover up how safe is the public and any subsequent research that the government declares safe because it is excellent? Can the public afford to bet their lives on allowing the government to lie so friends can use government programs to make money by labeling substandard products as excellent (i.e., vaccines, medicines, treatments, etc.)? The present update is made only to affirm the website is alive and your help is still needed. I am a cancer survivor, but the blacklisting and associated financial hardship makes life extremely difficult, exactly what the malicious mean-spirited people who blacklist intend. So changes often are delayed. The most basic request I can make of you is to have patience and tell as many people as you can about this site because you can help to change history and the world. Think about this, maybe if my research wasn’t suppressed to cover up fraud by the Universities of Waterloo and Yale, then Senator Ted Kennedy, or the brother of David Cook the new American Idol would not have to die from their brain cancer (please note my theory involved non invasive treatment to tell the tumours to die. Genetic programming signals). So many women say they walk for breast cancer and a cure, but if you look at the old section of the website you will see proposals going back to the early nineties to the drug companies and numerous universities that could have solved the problem by now. BUT no one helped! DO YOU REALLY CARE? If you do then you will help, it is that simple. FACT: I had cancer and used my theories and lived! My supervisor, who contaminated the lab (a bad scientist and mentor) with a cancer causing isotope had conventional treatment and DIED!!! New theories vs. old: I lived! Do you want to? Do you want to protect your loved ones? If you do then you will help.
          The previous 2007 Purple Section will be finished and included in the final Blue Section when the courier letter to Prime Minister Stephan Harper is complete and sent. It is entitled, “IS THE PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE (PMO) COMPLICIT IN A CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE?”A very serious letter connecting the University of Waterloo and RIM (Research in Motion, the Blackberry) past and present through President David Johnston, President Emeritus Douglas Wright and Chancellor Michael Laziridis to continuous lobbying of the federal government to cover up criminal activity at the taxpayers’ expense and the public good. Government should not be a partner in crime but must act to protect the public and must act to expose wrong doing, not cover it up. Karl Heinz Schreiber has his Brian Mulroney letter, but so do I, but mine proves that the former P.M. Brian Mulroney was aware of the criminality of the Administration of the University of Waterloo. And since this has arisen new evidence of other secret or held back papers/information by the government has come to my attention making a Public Inquiry of the Center of Excellence Program an important public health and safety issue. If you are an American or European/UK resident you may not appreciate how the Center of Excellence program affects you but there are similar programs running in the US and in the UK (another form) too. The Center of Excellence program is a danger because it takes away the independence of universities and makes researchers and students simply extended employees of private companies and as such can’t act in the public’s best interests to warn of dangerous drugs or practices. They can lose their careers and futures to blacklisting or even sued. In short universities aren’t centers of learning but drug development and technical training centers where employees (students and professors) are bound not by ethics and duty to mankind’s advancement but company policy even if it violates federal regulations and laws even though they are funded more by the taxpayer than private enterprise. A code of silence and corruption. That is unless you act to help expose this.
          How are you in danger and why was I black listed? Remember circa 1980 and the Tainted Blood Scandal where contaminated blood from American prisons was channeled through Canada and shipped all around the world infecting thousands of people with Hep C.There was a test for this that they didn’t use because of cost and they didn’t want the private company held liable so profit was put ahead of public safety. Fact: no one has gone to jail for this but the taxpayer was on the hook for the liability (not the private company). Wouldn’t you call the action criminal negligence causing harm? You think anyone learnt a lesson? You think wrong because people in the FDA and Health Canada are laughing at you. What about Mad cow? What about WMDs? What about the super tuberculosis bug that escaped from the FDA lab last year to fly around the world undetected among the public? What about the hoof and mouth outbreak in the UK from a so-called secure lab; how many farmers were hurt? Has anyone been held accountable ? When does it stop? How about the women in Newfoundland who died when their breast cancer tests were wrongly diagnosed? And what about Hemasol blood products that both the FDA and Health Canada allowed to continue testing even though secret documents (like I am seeking) told how people were endangered from clotting and heart attacks, this was just now exposed in 2008. But if you don’t care, then who does? That is why they can afford to laugh at you because you don’t do anything to hold them accountable.
          Note the link the between myself (E.A.Greenhalgh), President Douglas Wright of the University of Waterloo and the Center of Excellence program (the Canadian government), Tainted Blood and Hemasol Inc. I wrote the federal government upon discovering academic wrong doing at the University of Waterloo warning of the danger of profit over public safety from this program (Douglas Wright’s mantra reported in the papers was “millionaires wandering the halls of academia”). Unknown to me was the deep support of the federal government for this program and that they were helping to just start up the Hemasol Company from an assemblage of banks and businesses. The rest is history, I was black listed and cancer and AIDS theories were suppressed so Hemasol could create millionaires (the company has been reported to be in receivership as of 2008). The corruption and the danger to the public safety with the resultant harm is a PROVEN DOCUMENTED FACT!
I still believe in GOOD science and good scientists helping people. I also believe in good business and good practices, but I also believe that BAD BIOTECH and BAD people, scientist, politician or businessperson must be held accountable for their actions and if their actions result in harm then they must be held CRIMINALLY responsible. The harm from bad biotech, new diseases etc is just so very very real and deadly we can not have fools playing around with things that they don’t really understand and the belief that political connections will protect them. This is wrong and dangerous. What do you believe?
          This presentation is just a temporary update and when I have the material finished more will be added soon, but remember the black listing makes it hard to exist so patience and understanding are appreciated. Your help would be appreciated if you could tell more people of this website so the corruption can be exposed and treated appropriately. Thank you. Edward A.Greenhalgh 26 May 2008
Please note that if you are concerned about Global Warming one of Douglas Wright’s publicly expressed suggestions for the garbage crisis was incineration; this is what I have had to deal with. Please note regarding Global Warming see the Red Section and the Sars Mass Extinction section from the menu in the Green Section as it is not so much about SARS as the creation of NEW diseases resulting from pollution and in response to climate change. Each section discusses many topics so you should review each on its own merits.

August 2008: AIDS VACCINE FAILS

AIDS RESEARCH NEEDS OVERHAUL REQUIRING “ENORMOUS INTELLECTUAL LEAPS” and Dr. Anthony Fauci American official in charge of AIDS research states that he wants NEW people with NEW IDEAS to join the research. Was Dr. Fauci honest and truthful? Please see the emails I sent him, which, so far have gone unanswered. Maybe you, the public, should email him also and ask him why.

Click here to see the emails.

October 2007 Revision

OCTOBER 2007 NEW EVIDENCE NEW EXPLANATIONS

Douglas Wright and Michael Lazaridis of Research in Motion (RIM, the “blackberry”)/the University of Waterloo are playing the SEC like a Mafiosi plays a cheap violin. When the issue of basic research is publicly disclosed Chancellor of the University of Waterloo, Michael Lazaridis, will be exposed as a liar and a cheat; while former President and Chancellor, Douglas Wright to having a history of giving deliberately false signed assurances. ONLY A FEDERAL PUBLIC INQUIRY WITH TESTIMONY GIVEN UNDER OATH CAN PROVIDE THE COMPLETE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THESE SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS!

What will be demonstrated is that everything that is wrong with academia and the corruption of research today can be traced back to corrupt administration practices at the Universities of Waterloo and Yale. The acceptance and promotion of lying to achieve funding and status is compromising the very basic integrity of any research findings and the ethics of the presenters and represents a very clear danger to the public safety. This can be no more clearer in the safety of NEW vaccines, and presently with dangerous toys and escaped TB strains from CDC labs and the UK hoof and mouth disease disaster. Why do you trust people who are incompetent and lie? Do you believe al Qeda planned the attacks of 911 from Iraq? Conversely, did the holocaust happen? Yes or no? An academic question but you know the answer, however, criminals who seek to escape justice refuse to answer this question. Did the University of Waterloo deliberately, in premeditation, give false assurances for federal monies for a scholarship to Yale that they would not have otherwise received had they told the honest truth? Is this research that they received money for, and is described in official Health Ministry documents in derogatory terms, excellent? Yes or no? WHY NOT answer the question in public, University of Waterloo, unless, like a Nazi war criminal, your only defense is to deny your past? Your criminal past to escape justice? An academic question for an academic center that committed federal felony fraud.

How do academic questions affect your life? What good are signed assurances for pet food? Did your pet die? Children’s toys? Did your child eat lead today? How about vaccines? Could you be crippled or killed by a bad batch no one reports because someone hides a report or is told to coverup? Or Chimeras, (human animal cell clones), do you believe the lab precautions because a CEO signed assurances saying nothing can go wrong, like Mission Accomplished?
I need your help to continue the research I started but was black listed from completing so fraud could be covered up. I can’t do it alone without you and your help. If you want to help and make sure government tells the truth and enforces the law please read the new material. Please help expose the danger that could harm you and your family. I can’t do this alone. Thank you, Edward A.Greenhalgh,

LEGAL ETHICAL and SCIENTIFIC

2007 NEW FINDINGS: MAIN BODY

THE REASON THE CORRUPTION CONTINUES IS BECAUSE NO ONE TAKES THESE PEOPLE TO TASK.BAD CANCER RESEARCHERS LIKE DOPING CYCLISTS MUST BE EXPOSED, AND THEN ADVANCES IN CANCER CURES WILL BE MADE.

WHO SUPPRESSES CANCER RESEARCH? BAD PEOPLE DO!!!

The questions are:
1.who are the liars and cheaters?
2.How did they prosper?
3.What is the new research and how do you benefit?
4.How do you help?

WHO ARE THE LIARS AND CHEATERS?

The main criminals are:
Douglas Wright former President and Chancellor of the University of Waterloo, and
Dr.John E.Thompson former Chair of Biology and Dean of Science at the University of Waterloo.

I TOLD THE TRUTH CAN YOU HELP ME?

The website is a work in progress and more material is being prepared but at the moment this section is added so people can see where the issue is presently. However, I ask you read the Donald Drummond letter of the Toronto Dominion Bank (Americans will be familiar with its affiliates Waterhouse and Ameritrade). Mr. Donald Drummond likes to say profound things in the press and during the 2006 AIDS conference he said AIDS was a threat to the world economy. I must inform you that TD has a prominent presence on the University of Waterloo campus. I ask you to read the funding proposal I sent him (see below to read letter). From the material he IS fully aware that the University of Waterloo has lied and my research has been vindicated, but what does he do? This man who claims research advancements are important to society does, well, NOTHING! I received a telephone call from his secretary, a Ms.Davies (SIC) who informed me that they WERE NOT GOING TO RESPOND TO MY LETTER! So there. What do you think they should have done? Now compare this to the Godsoe letter /Bank of Nova Scotia found in a past section, see the Green menu. Another banker who does nothing. Did you know Scotia bank has a hockey team in Ottawa (Senators) and they sponsor sporting events? Did you know that in the US Fannie Mae is being criminally investigated for their student loan deals with universities? Do these banks make a lot of money from guaranteed loans in Canada, and is that why they have a major presence on campus? Question not an answer.
Additional material soon to be added **********
Work in progress***********

Ph. 519-579-8320

Email: HYPERLINK "mailto:info@cancerfraudbadbiotech.com" info@cancerfraudbadbiotech.com

Edward A.Greenhalgh

May 2007 Revision

2007 NEW FINDINGS

How Criminal Acts (Felony Fraud) Committed by Officials of the University of Waterloo/RIM [the blackberry] Blocked Cancer and AIDS Research. How YALE Benefited Compromising the Basic Integrity of Scientific Research and the Serious Consequences for People like Michael J. Fox and Claims of Truthful Ethical EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH .The Major Role of Business and Banks to REDIRECT Public Money, Federal Programs and the Law to Suit Personal Private Agendas. The Impact on Society from Cloned Meat and Genetically Modified Foods to the Spread of Mad Cow Disease. Why Bad Scientists, Universities, Politicians and Businesspeople MUST Be Held ACCOUNTABLE to the LAW and Federal Programs and the Public. How TACTICS used by the University of Waterloo/RIM are the SAME Ones Used by a Former Nazi SS Death Squad Member to Escape Justice. And How the Consequences of such Actions to have the ELITE RULE and be ABOVE the LAW/ACCOUNTABILITY make a JOKE out of ANY Claims of bioethics (for stem cell research, and other biotech projects including the world's AIDS efforts, flu pandemic, new vaccines and global warming). If Business Controls Universities and are allowed to LIE and Violate the LAW and Federal Regulations, who do you believe and why are you safe? And if you are shareholder concerned about RIM's accounting practices, the SEC has started a formal inquiry of RIM and you may want to contact the SEC yourself to tell them about the history of one of their (RIM's) Board of Directors, Douglas Wright, who as the former President and CEO of the University of Waterloo, has a documented history of giving Deliberately False Assurances for federal programs, funds and considers himself (The Elite) to be better than everyone else and above the Law and Accountability and to use political connections to manipulate federal officials and the law in order to achieve personal gain not otherwise possible by honest means. Read the following to see what you can do to make things better.

Topics: Merck/Pfizer/Bill Gates Microsoft/TD Waterhouse Ameritrade/ Scotiabank/AIDS-Africa pandemic/Breast Cancer/ Vaccines/Bird Flu and Pandemics/Yale's New Cancer Center/Hilary Rodham Clinton and New Ideas for America/Affirmative Action for the Middle Class and Poor vs. the Elite/Monsanto and Genetically Modified Food /Cloned Meat, Safety and the Family Farm vs. Factory Farming Ramifications/The RCMP Commissioner Resigned Amid Misconduct Allegations /Global Warming and Emerging Diseases/ The Globe and Mail Publisher, Geoff Beattie and Relationship to Princess Margaret Cancer Center and University of Waterloo/RIM[the Blackberry]/Political Misconduct by Former Prime Ministers Mulroney, Chretien and Martin ;their connections and control by UW/Influence on the US Congress to Avoid Enforcing the Law and Federal Regulations/Failure of Breast Implant Testing/Why the USDA Doesn't Want to Test All Cows for Mad Cow Disease. Basic Question: Is Lying For Money Fraud? Yes or No? What Cancer is, and Why Bad People have been Fighting me while Innocent People are Allowed to Die. Implications for ALL Research. A Personal Challenge for Bono of U2 and Mrs. Melinda Gates: Save 20 Children in Africa from AIDS: Empty Talk is Cheap!
************************************************

May 2007, Dear Reader, the website is being updated and the material to support this introduction is being prepared, but is extensive and must be cross referenced to the previous updates. Personal hardships; such as a severe viral respiratory infection in February, and some nasty person spiking our car tires has added to this delay and the general hardships I had to face. So much is said about donating to cancer research especially using small children with baldheads, and women with breast cancer, and the people say, this MAY, this COULD help find a cure for cancer. Well, Ifs and MAYBEs and COULDs are good enough, then isn't it fair to ask the question that if Douglas Wright Fmr President of U of W (and a board member of RIM) and Dr.J.E.Thompson (former Dean of Science at U of W) blocked my cancer theories, shouldn't they be considered "baby killers" etc. by the same coulda woulda token? Especially since the Cell Death Gene Signal is now considered to be an integral part of modern cancer research? And shouldn't Dr.Tak Mak of the Ontario Cancer Institute be compared to the same type of doctors who opposed Semmelwiess who in the 19th century fought to have doctors sterilize their instruments and wash their hands. This concerns a comment Dr.Mak made on TVO concerning breast cancer and pregnancy: he almost sounded like a religious fundamentalist in his fatalist comments. My theory, VTT will explain some very significant points concerning the very causes of this cancer which, once explained like Cell Death Signal Gene, may make treating the disease in older women easier. These are some of the serious topics to be explained and one of the reasons why the update is taking so long. But in light of the Governments' mishandling of the WMDs (never existed) in the USA, and Canada's blotched cover up of the 1985 Air India disaster, you can see why time is essential to uncover the misconduct of government officials who refuse to enforce the law and federal regulations so cronies can escape justice and accountability.

Please review the Gold Section and Red Sections for issues that are important such as the implication of emerging diseases and how the pharmaceutical industry CAN'T protect you: they asked the President for a release from any liability for any flu vaccine they may produce. Please note, the Global Warming will promote the emergence of new deadlier diseases and it is not the production of ONE flu vaccine that will be required, but several and on a timely schedule. They have already admitted they can't do it. Think about it. Go to the Green Section and Read Mass Extinction/SARS; it is not about SARS but how the changing climate, pollution and GMO promote new diseases that you have no protection from. Which is why I so desperately need your help. To overcome the malicious blacklisting and financial harm caused by various people associated with the University of Waterloo/Rim and Yale plus the various government agencies acting to protect them. I do need your help to expose and over come this corruption. Please be patient as the changes to this section will be made and are coming as soon as possible. Thank you.
Edward A. Greenhalgh, 07 May 2007

May 2006 Revision Title

Stem cells were supposed to be a miracle, but all that has been proven is that the South Korean researcher lied and the majority of western institutions/researchers were of such low standards they were unable to detect the flaws and lies. Worst, they seemed more than willing to accept and promote the lie if they (too) could (share in the pie) receive billions of tax dollars for themselves to fund useless research. Useless research solves nothing and people die or are crippled with false hopes. Mrs. Nancy Reagan, they would misuse your dreams and good will in order to lie to use you for money and give back nothing in return (they would steal). That is the definition of bad scientists and universities: people who give deliberate false assurances to gain money for nothing except personal gain and why institutions which give FALSE SIGNED ASSURANCES for taxpayers'/federal monies must be held ACCOUNTABLE! This is especially RELEVANT in light of proposed FLU vaccines – you could die if a bad one is produced and no one is held ACCOUNTABLE and LIABLE. We are talking about the public TRUST and SAFETY. Institutions and researchers must be held to high standards and accountability.

Everyone is talking about a (bird) flu pandemic, but what if that is NOT the real danger? Could YOU be (genetically) TAGGED FOR DEATH? Scroll down to the Gold Zone main body text for the full explanation from research suppressed in the early nineties: research blacklisted to cover up academic federal fraud by Waterloo and Yale universities. Research suppressed in flagrant violations of federal mandates (the law). However, (before continuing) please note that the drug companies have told Pres. Bush that they CAN'T (won't) precede with the development of new flu vaccines unless they are free from ANY liability. Please note in the previous 2005 Red Zone Revision I wrote Pfizer concerning the bird flu and vaccines, and informed the then CEO McKinnell that I may love his children more than he does because I have sacrificed so much to develop this research.

I have also contacted many many members of the federal governments warning them of the potential harm/deaths to their loved ones. My point is; the drug companies should have responded, ”Yes Sir, Mr. President, we will get on that right away because we have families too, and don't want them to die. Liability concerns? No, Sir, Mr. President, because our families would have to suffer too. We will produce a vaccine that is safe and effective for all. We will personally guarantee this!” Unfortunately, they didn't say that, but instead whined about liability and other excuses that only proved that they (and their Center of Excellence program) are not up to the challenges facing society. They prove my point that they are only concerned about money /profit and not new research that will save lives. If they aren't even concerned about their own families, just where do you and your own family fit into the big picture (think about it)? So when I say that political pressure has been brought to bear, which can threaten the profits of companies, causing the blacklisting of my person and research so academic fraud could be covered up and federal agencies (including the police) have performed improper investigations (misdirection) to cover up the wrong doing, you can see that money and influence form the basis for this statement being proven true.

Remember, Rumsfeld lied about Iraqi/ Al Qaeda ties, and the Gomery inquiry (Canada) has proven federal misuse of tax dollars; it is proven that federal people do lie to achieve private agendas, so my claims have a solid basis. So, if you don't want to be TAGGED for DEATH, read the new section and you can help by asking others to read this too (email people /blog it) because the public's help is needed to expose the corruption to help the research go forward and undo the black listing. Scroll down to the main body of text in the Gold Zone.

Home

Contact Information

Stem Cell Research Emails to Congress

2003 DOJ/RCMP Letters

2003 Email to Paul Martin MAD COW & Social Justice

2003 Emails to PM Martin and BONO.

Mission Statement Summary

Good Gene Gone Bad

Mass Extinction / SARS

Letter of Appeal to the Public

E-mail to Attorney General

E-mail to Secy. of Health

Letter to CEO Peter Godsoe - Bad Biotechnology

My Resume

The Fraud and Plagiarism

My Research

V.T.T. - Origin of Life

Schedule

Old Research Proposals

RCMP (CANADA)

Dept. of Justice (USA)

E-mail to John Ashcroft

Coombe Hill 1996 Letter

Andrew Telegdi Letters

U.S. Dept. of Justice

False Claims Act

Letter to PM of Canada

Univ. of Texas Letter

Supreme Court of Canada

Donna Shalala Correspondence

Spearing-Dockery Correspondence

Cal Sneed Correspondence

Dep. Chieft Farrington

Letter #1

Call for Evidence

Ministry of Health (CDN)

Request for Information

Letter to Allan Rock

Supreme Court of Canada

Andrew Telegdi Letters

Related Links

Biotechnology HQ Resource

A to Z Fraud

If the issues on the website cause you concern please share them with your Congressional Representative or Member of Parliament. Please write the appropriate Senate Committe too.

"Thank you for your...letter to Surgeon General Jocelyn Elders... Dr. Elders asked that I respond. We regret the difficulties that you have encountered at the University of Waterloo."

--Winston J. Dean, J.D., M.P.H.
Senior Advisor
Office of the Surgeon General
October 17, 1994

"Due to our limited resources, TAF can assist in only a small number of cases each year... Everything you have been through sounds awful."
--Alan Shusterman, Esq
Associate Director
Taxpayers Against Fraud
September 17, 1997

President George W. Bush has stated, "Justice may take time, but I'm a patient man."

Fact : There are no statutes of limitations for fraud committed against the U.S. Federal Government.

Fact : Cancer research theories were blocked so as to allow and cover up scholarship fraud at Yale.

Mass Extinction / SARS
"may be of phenomonal importance"
--Noam Chomsky 2004

"The end does not justify the means."
--Paul Martin commenting on corrupt goverment.

"The government overlooked signs of danger, should bad science continue to be overlooked?"
--911 Commision

Sign up for my newsletter as there will be updates to this site!

To view the articles you need to download:

Click image to get it!

AGUST 2006 SUMMARY

The Culture of Entitlement Blocks Cancer Research

Why and who would block cancer research? The answer is universities and the federal government. The reason is that they can. Powerful and rich business people make up the board of governors of universities and these same people either are politicians themselves or their friends. In the end it is cronyism over the public good that decides that cancer research would be blocked. The complicated is made to sound simple. The open public discussion that would follow is intended for the public good: something good to come from the exposure of corruption.

Who am I? I am a cancer survivor who used my own theories to treat my cancer, the same as Lance Armstrong's, and turning down chemo and radiation, my doctors thought I would die. Eight years later, and 23 plus catscans and x-rays etc. my doctor said I am cured. No brain tumour or lung cancer like Mr. Armstrong, I am quite fine thank you. My former supervisor died of cancer. The official university Secretary who told me he had cancer and didn't care if my research involved cancer theories also died of cancer. And the university which black listed me and suppressed the research has now plagiarized my theories. Indeed the Dean of Science has founded a business in collaboration with an American firm claiming the theory as his original concept. This is explained on the website. But please note, the research was suppressed so a C minus physics student could get a biology PhD and a scholarship to Yale. Even though at the request of the university that if I could get one competent authority to support my theory they would allow my thesis to stand. When I brought them a leading cancer researcher they backed down saying you get your experts and we will get ours. Please note their entire funding and the scholarship fraud depended upon there being no other theory. And like in the Blood Scandal I even provided them with a simple cheap chemical test to check and prove the research. That is what science is supposed to do, provide repeatable tests. They refused. They couldn't deal with the truth. They knew the answer they wanted and the truth would not let them commit fraud.

AUGUST 2006 SUMMARY

The Culture of Entitlement Blocks Cancer Research

Long story short; the research is even more relevant today than it was several years before because it explains how a genetic sequence on the AIDS virus could interact with the bird flu to TAG for DEATH 70% of the human race. Noam Chomsky has said my theory may be of phenomenal importance to mankind. A former US Surgeon General has written regretting my treatment.

What is the problem? I have caught several prominent business people in a fraud and the Ministry of Health is implicated as an accomplice violating federal mandates, and even the law. And American Federal personnel under PHS are exposed for lying in writing and conspiracy to cover up federal fraud and Mandate violations. The evidence is on the website. Further complications are from the Center of Excellence program, where profs use the taxpayer's money to create businesses to become millionaires but return nothing to the taxpayers. I had a three-hour argument with a leading cancer researcher who refused scientific evidence in order to cover up the wrong doing and yelled at me saying my standards are too high!!! You have cancer, people, what kind of researchers do you want, qualified ones, or those without biology and chemistry backgrounds whose qualifications are fabricated? The problem, as proven by the South Korean stem cell researcher, is too many researchers are lying, and depending on associates who are also lying to cover up for them. These people do not want honest people around because of the fear of exposure.

I must direct you to read an article found on the web by Margaret Munro of the National Post dated 16 March 2006 and titled, “Medical Researchers Caught Faking It. Federal Grant Recipients.” You will find it eye opening and will make you wonder, had the federal police laid the fraud charges when I asked them to, would the subsequent trials/convictions etc. have worked as a deterrent and prevented all this now. We can still send a message to bad scientists and bad universities. Bad scientists are no better than predators preying off society (like child molesters in many cases). And universities that do not correct their misconduct are predators too!. Why should they receive your taxes if they are going to cheat you? It is not just the money, but bad research blocks and suppresses research that saves likes. Your own life or your child's. Would you let a child molester harm your child? So why do you let bad scientists steal life away from sick children? Please tell me why? I am very tired of trying to promote scientific integrity to save lives when the public just doesn't seem to care for their own children.

There are three points from the Munro article I wish to consider;

1.The Canadian Institutes of Health Research/Ministry of Health (CHIR) identifies researchers to be violating ethics or integrity rules at the universities of Dalhousie, McGill, McMaster and Sunnybrooke Medical Centers; among others. You must note I received a terrible excuse from Dalhousie regarding cancer research. And Sunnybrooke is part of the U of Toronto Cancer Complex whom also gave me funny excuses. And McMaster is a high lighted case on the website. You must read the letter of research and introduction I sent to the President of the Bank of Nova Scotia (one of the world's biggest banks), Mr. Peter Godsoe, who was handing out scholarships at the time. And I highlighted one researchers work there, a Dr.Rosenthal, and his failure while I was still alive from cancer. You must read the entire letter on the main website; see the menu in the Green Section/Godsoe and Bad Biotechnology. You may now understand why they didn't want an honest and truthful researcher coming to McMaster given their ethics and integrity problems. But in all fairness to McMaster and the quality of their research, one of the scholarship recipients was an undergrad (no graduate degrees of any type) who was being guaranteed a job for life (like Riley) doing breast cancer research and see if this person is of truthful enough standards for cancer research? Lets ask this scholarship recipient the basic question; “is research described by official government documents in derogatory terms and can't be repeated, EXCELLENT?” Can this person truthfully answer the question? If they can't, then what good are they to society?

2.The article also claimed that investigators are hampered by government secrecy and unco-operative universities. To this I can add the proof that when I asked the then Federal Health Minister, Alan Rock, for a federal document that cancelled Carlson's grant at U of W and would have proven my plagiarism case against not only U of Waterloo, but Yale as well, he refused. He claimed it was against the law for me to have that article. Had I received that document I could have gone on to prove my cancer theory and save peoples lives. This was not his, nor the Ministry of Health's priority. They were involved in a criminal cover up, not to protect the public and prevent cancer deaths but protect powerful influential billionaires (like Chancellor M.Lazaridis president of RIM—the Blackberry – who only makes a salary of 100 million a year). See people dying of cancer don't count when it comes to billionaires. The American government is no better. Told about the document they refused to request it; and as explained in the 2006 Gold Section, all to protect Yale, another haven of billionaires. Please note, BOTH GOVERNMENTS ARE MANDATED BY FEDERAL LAW TO PROMOTE RESEARCH OF MEDICAL BENEFIT TO THE TAXPAYERS!!!!! How did their cover up save lives?

3. The Munro article goes on to note that “documents released by CHIR revealed universities in some cases, have let misconduct investigations drag on so long that researchers accused of faking results or unethical conduct have gone to new jobs or left the country.” And Health Canada has refused to share information that was key to the investigation and conviction of the misconduct case, Munro goes on. Please note as explained above with the Health minister Alan Rock, this was also found in my dealings with the federal police. They refused to produce the documents signed by UW Pres./CEO Wright and Dean of Science Thompson, as that would have proven the fraud case. See in the Red Section of the Website my letter to the RCMP Commissioner: (2) R.C.M.P. Commissioner Zarcardelli letter and reply, (3) R.C.M.P Public Complaints Commission email/letter; Holocaust Denial and the University of Waterloo, again very eye opening, the RCMP covering up for felony criminals.

But, you must ask yourself, WHY? If you read the Munro article you will see the American government have convicted researchers of federal fraud, so what is so different about this case? Answer, I am holding the Administrators, those who give the signed assurances accountable, not just the lowly professor, but thePres. /Chancellor and Dean of Science. These are crony prestige positions, especially in the case of a chancellor. Chancellorships are often given to political hacks as a reward. So if they are held criminally accountable this position must in the future become an important position given to people of character, not just some political crony. And the American government would also have to implicate Yale!!! And by doing so expose many scholarships not as honestly earned rewards for excellent students but as Affirmative Action programs for Stupid Rich White Kids. The American government didn't want this. Certainly, Dr.Shapirio of Princeton didn't when I wrote him as part of Pres. Clinton's Bioethics Commission (see on main website).

Why shouldn't Presidents, chancellors and Deans be held accountable for the truthfulness of their Signed Assurances? This is no different than ENRON etc., where now CEOs must give transparency signature assurances and if they lie they go to prison. Universities receive money for cancer and AIDS, and NOW Stem Cell research. Do you want honest research benefiting society, or do you want Affirmative Action for Stupid Rich White Kids? See the South Korean researcher who lied about his stem cell discoveries. The Norwegian cancer researcher who made up his data, or go google research fraud or university fraud and find out how many hundreds or thousands of hits you get. Stop the cheating. Start here and use this case to send a powerful message.

Let me make this clear, the people who black listed the cancer theories stopped me from receiving a five thousand dollar grant several years ago. Chancellor Lazaridis was a student circa 1986 when my Cell Death Signal Gene theory was developed. He received support from Pres. Douglas Wright and Trevor Eyton and others promoting the Center of Excellence Scheme (I have asked for a federal government public inquiry to get all the facts straight and have been refused so far). I just wanted to leave to develop the cancer treatments. Laziridis' RIM prospered because of the corrupt UW administration. Politics promoted RIM, which will never save one cancer or AIDS victim. RIM in its patent battle has received support from PM Paul Martin. PM Jean Chretien who played golf with President Clinton when he came to Uof Waterloo. And PM Brian Mulroney, who lobbied for RIM just last year. Please note about cancer research I wrote; PM Mulroney, and Jeff Foster replied Mulroney was aware of my letter. I wrote PM Chretien, who didn't reply, but his Deputy PM Sheila Copps did. He was aware and didn't care for cancer victims. But he did promote Rim. And the Same with PM Martin. As for President Bill Clinton, he did nothing, but The US Surgeon General did reply regretting my treatment. Laziridis gets one hundred million a year. This is why he got help, and my research is suppressed. So what?

Douglas Wright was a Conservative politician. Premier Mike Harris was a Conservative who sentenced a welfare student to death for using her welfare to pay off her student loan. He had her sentenced to house arrest in a tiny house with no air-conditioning during a summer heat wave, She died for paying off her student loan. J.C.M.Riley came from and elite family with political connections at Waterloo and got to go to Yale. Why shouldn't Douglas Wright and Dr. J.E.Thompson be charged with fraud? Conservative Premier Mike Harris has set the standard?

I must raise one other simple point on why this case is important to ordinary taxpayers who work hard and pay taxes; your children are being cheated out of jobs because many positions and scholarships are pre-arranged frauds. There is no honest and open competition. In many cases the position or scholarship has been decided years in advance, the rich elite kid has been GUARANTEED the scholarship etc. As for the US case, from the Abramoff Lobbying Scandal do you conclude that all of Washington is corrupt? And that competition is just window dressing? Is every competition rigged? Was every federal government contract rigged like the Gomery Commission showed us? Every competition does not have to be, just one crime has to be one crime: get the point. Your kids deserve an honest chance, especially since the elite children already have everything going for them to begin with.

This has been a simple outline of a very serious situation. I believe I can find the answer to cancer in a few years, and I am being black listed by fearful little petty people who have a vested interest to cover up fraud. I believe my research has important consequences to several areas important to the public good, but I can't do anything without the public's help to undo the wrongs I have encountered. I am hoping that the public's (the common man and woman in the street) belief in justice and fair play will agree. I hope that you will read my website and demand a public discussion and a public inquiry. I believe society would benefit from this. I can not continue with out your help.

Thank you.

Edward A. Greenhalgh

No one could imagine a disaster like the WTC could happen because everyone believed that government had adequate safeguards to protect society; just as no one wants to believe that the same government would block cancer research in order to cover up scholarship fraud. Sept. 11/2001 proved the unimaginable does happen due to what the American Senator Richard Shelby called "bureaucratic bungling." And the public must know that it is true that the governments of Canada and the United States blocked cancer research theories in order to cover up federal fraud; please read the email sent on 05 Sept. 2001 to the U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft for details.

The world community, ordinary people and legal experts alike, is asked for help. Please answer the question "IS LYING FOR U.S. FEDERAL MONIES (which would not be granted if the honest truth were told) FRAUD?" Yes, or no? The following Website took at least 180 hours of scanning to prepare and several thousand dollars. The Federal Police of Canada and the U.S. were told that the evidence would be placed on the internet for the world community's consideration because corruption and cover-up are cited. Cover up and political favoritism /corruption is especially noted to Canada with the Federal Minister Boudria etc as a fact of life in Canadian politics. Everyone is asked to appreciate the time and effort taken to present the effort and note how the suppressed research has been repeatedly emphasized to the authorities as being necessary for the public good so no one can say it was done "frivolously" or "vexatiously". These are slanderous terms that bad governments try to use hoping to discredit the victim when they try to cover up wrongdoing. The world community may ask that if you would spend so much effort, why not just do the research you claim is for the public good? Blacklisting does not allow you to do research or even receive employment, and so demonstrates the malicious nature of the people suppressing the research. The Canadian federal government must be scrutinized because at any time the Health Minister could have helped the research, but instead my Charter of Rights and Freedoms have been violated and the Federal Government must be seen as reprehensible. Please review the documentation of fraud, suppression of cancer theory, the blacklisting, and realize it represents only ten percent that is available.

The World Community is asked to read the " Addendum " sent to the DOJ/Deputy Chief Farrington and the U.S. Congress Committee on Energy and Commerce, plus the material sent to the CEO of the Bank of Nova Scotia (Scholarship Fraud and Bad Biotechnology) and the e-mail to U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow concerning research and healthcare costs (29 May, 2002). The research will benefit society but the blacklisting and harm can only be undone with help from you, the World Community.

Read entire letter.

Edward A. Greenhalgh
May 29, 2002

NEW SECTION REVISION 2004

The documentation PROVES that research of value to cancer was blocked so criminal, academic fraud could be committed. The evidence also proves that cancer research is blocked for money by business people and politicians in order to continue receiving taxpayers' moneys and gain control of patents. Cancer and AIDS theories (now proven correct) were suppressed to cover up the fraud by both the US and Canadian governments. Personnel under the IGO lied in writing as have Canadian officials. Civil rights violations from the blacklisting resulted in order to delay the cancer theories so established cancer centers could get credit (your donations to speed up research are wasted). Both the Canadian and American governments have violated their own laws ( Congress, War Against Cancer Act, and Acts of Canadian Parliament) in order to suppress the cancer and AIDS theories. Various politicians from both countries are cited for dereliction of duty, and collusion in suppressing the research in order to promote and protect the Centers of Excellence Scheme. If you have IBM or Microsoft stock, you should write complaints to the board that they are associated with a Center that blocked cancer research. The greater danger as seen in Tainted Blood, Mad Cow Disease and Avian Flu , is if government will lie about basic federal standards and laws in order to cover up academic fraud for elite friends, then why won't they lie about dangers from bad biotech (especially if they receive donations from the firms)? Remember how truthful they were about WMDs and 911; and the Sponsorship Scandal!

What the documentation proves is that new cancer theories are held back by politicians and their friends for money and malicious reasons: all betraying the public trust. If you want to speed up research , then you must act to help expose the corruption and hold wrongdoers criminally responsible. It is the only way to send a message and ensure that science and the new biotechnology are safe.

Edward A. Greenhalgh May 2004

Click here to continue this story...

REVISION AUGUST 2005

U.S.CONGRESS BIOSHIELD INITIATIVE

(See letter dated 14 June 2001 on the original website sent by courier to the US Congress Commerce and Energy Committee care of Mr.. Johnson)

TOPICS: Cancer/AIDS, Stem Cell Research, Bird Flu and New Diseases plus Genetically Modified Crops effecting the Environment/Evolution.

REPORTED in the Media July 2005: the US Congress has asked the Pharmaceutical Industry to participate in the BioShield Initiative to produce new vaccines against new flues and emerging diseases. The Pharmaceutical Industry DECLINED participation citing a lack of PROFITABILITY and the RISK OF LIABILITY.

QUESTION: who will do the NECESSARY research in order to protect the public?

FACT: reported in the media July 2005 that Chiron, a major flu vaccine supplier to the US and was previously closed down last year due to health/quality concerns, is AGAIN reporting production problems. If they can't get their act together in a non-emergency humdrum time how in heaven's name will respond during a crisis?

Point, my research is not just about cancer and AIDS or even bird flu, it is about the emerging new diseases and the return of old ones we thought defeated. Antibiotics and the "miracle" drugs have been over used so new strains of resistant diseases have developed. You need dedicated imaginative people to meet the challenge, not bureaucrats.

Point, the Canadian government as of July 2005 cancelled 34 million dollars in grants to labs developing cancer, AIDS and SARS vaccines citing them not to be profitable: Bureaucrats with no foresight of future needs. Note, the US government orders fighter planes to protect their homeland, and fighter planes will NEVER show a profit but they are necessary. The Canadian government bought surplus scrapped and refurbished diesel submarines (and cost a sailor 's life) for billions of dollars, but these machines will never show a profit nor will they necessarily protect anyone. See what I'm up against and I want to help society.

Please see the June 2005 letter sent to Pfizer CEO/Chairman Hank McKinnell (at the end of this) wherein I address the above concerns. Mr.McKinnell's/Pfizer's reply will be made available when received. I wish to point out to the public the lengths I have had to go to try and get the research to benefit society. Included are the most RECENT proposals sent to Merck, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, plus emails to the Prime Minister of Canada, Paul Martin. My research concerns/theories have a long history so I am not just now jumping on any bandwagon; they date back to the early nineties. Indeed, the Viroid Thermodynamic Theory on the Origin of Life (VTT) was included in material sent to the president of Hoeschst-Celanese circa 1992 (see old research proposal section) and note in a discussion on cancer/AIDS/genetic basis for evolution and new flues there is the mention of a protein relevant to breast cancer treatment. Two points, 1) researchers are now developing such a protein to combat breast cancer, which interferes with the tumour growth, and 2) Hoechst-Celanese is the parent of Aventis or Connaught labs (U of Toronto) which produces vaccines in Canada some of which are sold to the US. Research to develop new techniques for new types of vaccines could have started as early as 92, and if you know anyone who died of breast cancer, well, maybe they shouldn't have. Remember, U of W blacklisted me to cover up the academic fraud. I sent these proposals out to all the major drug companies because I thought this was the only way around the suppression and to speed up the worldwide research. Please note, Pfizer is gong to be coming out with such protein based drugs soon too, so perhaps my plan did succeed after all. My ideas did help, but now if you do want to protect your family I need your help. The life you save may be someone who loves you, and isn't such a life worth saving? What kind of person/cancer researcher blocks research for money? The question at first seems silly, but many cancer researchers are simply bad people holding a position for money and power (a gatekeeper). Professional athletes have used steroids to advance themselves and get millions of dollars even though it may cause health problems and their records are frauds. And they are just people, like cancer researchers and University CEOs who put themselves first ahead of ethics and others. And in evidence of this bad attitude was quite clear in the reply where cronyism takes precedence over scientific advancement of cancer research by the USA Endocrinlogical Society's response to charges of plagiarism against my former supervisor when I found out he repeated my experiments (please note, the Canadian government had already cancelled his grant and described his work in derogatory terms so to get his grant back he repeated my work. None of this the Government told me, how strange). They said it wasn't important if the work was important to cancer research because someone else would repeat it sooner or later. Sooner or later, you remember this if you know of anyone with cancer because I want you to realize that the letterhead of this official response was the City of Hope, a cancer research center!!! How awful. And about the politics of cancer, please note the reply I received from the Canadian Cancer Society when I asked them for help to develop the research. They simply refused giving the reason that I had criminal charges pending against the University of Waterloo so they wouldn't get involved. Excuse me but please realize I came to them with proof of my accomplishments and finally found out the research at U of W was classified in derogatory terms. They chose not to help proven work and protect cronies. Please note the Canadian Cancer Society has strong connections to the University of Toronto, which incorporates a large cancer center, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, and circa 1992 I had already explained to Dr. Ling there the Cell Death Signal Gene Theory to tell tumours to die. All Dr. Ling wanted to do was fight with me and tell me how good U of W was and important my former supervisor was. What was more important; cancer research or protecting a crony? If Dr. Ling wishes to publicly dispute ANYTHING he must first, on the public record, answer the questions, 1) is research described in derogatory terms excellent, and 2) is lying for money fraud? Also, has Dr. Ling's work found the cure for cancer? By the way in 2002 researchers at U of T announced finding a gene that tells tumours to die. How many years later? Is this the type of attitude to "make cancer history" or just keep the money rolling in?

FACT: I am a cancer survivor who had the same cancer as Lance Armstrong in 1997 but turned down chemo/radiation to apply my theories and 22 catscans etc later am cancer free without the secondary cancers Mr. Armstrong suffered. A doctor told me it was unusual for a person of 43 to get that type of cancer.

FACT: my former supervisor at UW died of cancer in 2004; he had conventional treatment, and his research was useless to him. Points 1 and 2 are connected by events related to J. C.M.Riley's research circa 1987 wherein they ordered radioactive iodine isotope for use in their experiments. Riley, whose work is officially recognized in derogatory terms, (he really was only a C- BSc. Physics student on his own merit) contaminated the lab, so if anyone else who had any association with that lab or shared facilities has developed cancer then there may be a direct link to the low standards that the University of Waterloo allows to exist. I believe there is now a strong causal link between my own cancer and that which caused my former supervisor's death. See bad science can kill.

These facts are mentioned because the bad practices and lost research were brought to the attention of both federal governments (US & Canada) and they chose to cover up wrong doing at the expense of advancing new ideas and beneficial research. Please note in relevance circa 20th July 2005 the CDC in press conference in response to vaccines and autism and the removal of a controversial preservative said they ensure vaccines are as safe as possible and respond to the known scientific facts they have available to them. I have just proven that both governments are good at ignoring evidence presented before them, and you the public if you want to be safe must hold them accountable. Ask them to lay the fraud charges, as this will send a very powerful message to anyone withholding scientific evidence as we have seen harm can result.

WILL THE POLITICIANS HAVE POLICIES TO PROTECT YOU?

Both governments have been proven willing to cover up bad science even if it means research will be delayed or lost and people are allowed to die. Think about this and the concerns of new diseases which will require new vaccines and new ideas; will they be able to respond to save your family?

The Gomery (Scandal) Inquiry has uncovered the fact that the Chretien (Canada) government was handing out brown envelopes stuffed with thousands of dollars to cronies in exchange for favours. Chretien's former Health Minister, Alan Rock as Justice Minister wasted 2 billion (2000 million) dollars on a gun registry that is not finished. Rock is now Canada's ambassador to the UN covering such topics as AIDs, emerging diseases and human rights. Please note that 2 billion could have helped PM Martin appease Bono on Canada's failed 0.7% commitment to the third world. Nonetheless, former, PM Chretien appeared arrogantly before the Gomery Inquiry with commemorative golf balls as his defense (he collects these because he likes to golf and there is a club next to his retirement home which he helped subsidize with taxpayers' money). I asked PM Chretien (and PM Mulroney see reply elsewhere) for help for the cancer research and all the wrongdoing. This is a man whose wife picked out commemorative watches under the sponsorship scandal which he had time to approve, but he made no reply to my cancer concerns even though it was a courier letter. However, his deputy PM ,Sheila Copps did reply (see elsewhere), so the only conclusion we can make is Chretien believes golf is more important than helping people with cancer. If you had a loved one die of cancer have a commemorative golf ball made up with the monogrammed loved one's name, type of cancer and date of death on it and mailed to Mr. Chretien. Send it care of the present PM, Paul Martin in Ottawa Canada; I am sure he will get the message.

US politicians, from Congressman Dingel to Mr. Johnson at Energy and Commerce, are no better: the list is too long to mention them all, but please note for people who claim they want new treatments and ideas brought to the US they react very badly. Indeed, from the main menu select "email sent to US Congress on Stem Cell Research for insight (it was resent to given address). Rep. D. Cunningham (R Calif) appeared in the media explaining why he voted for its passage; he had a 6 yr old boy with diabetes appear before their committee who has since died, and said he didn't want anymore little boys to die due lack of research. Rep. Cunningham and his committee never responded to me, nor asked me to testify. I am not opposed to any research which saves lives (also see 2004 Revised Section on this) but expect my high ethical standards scare the insincere. Several other congressmen appeared on the media supporting Stem Cell Research but said high ethical standards would have to be applied! Please note, Rep. Cunningham is now under ethical investigation, but I believe their Committee could have gained a lot had they responded to my email points for the proposed research. You should read them, and then email Congress yourself and ask them to respond.

POINT: The Korean scientist who lead the team which has recently cloned human cells has said you should fund the research, okay, lets test his ethical standards and ask him to answer my major Questions in public. Is research, which is described, in derogatory terms excellent? And is lying for funding fraud? If he refuses, then his committment to high scientific ethics are open to question. Fair enough.

The point is many are crying that stem cell research will give you many miracles, especially in cancer, but if you look at my email (and all my correspondence to US government) that seems to be the least of anyone's concern because no one has helped. Please recall I had Cancer and survived, but a brother with prostate cancer died with conventional treatment; and a niece has still survived. And about your poor 6 yr old, Rep. Cunningham, I have a 4 yr old great nephew (an identical twin by the way) with a brain tumour, so spare me your phony tears, you could have helped. Indeed maybe cancer would be history right now if it wasn't for the black listing to cover up the fraud at Yale and UW. As for my family, I can treat myself with anything, but not family members. It would be irresponsible science without the proven clinical studies to support my claims, so I have been forced to sit back and watch as my brother died and the others have suffered due to your lack of diligence. And, similarly, Rep. Arlen Spector who also appeared on CNN and said he had cancer which was why he was supporting stem cell research so others would not have to suffer should have his commitment questioned as I phoned his office and asked him to review my website. No response from Rep. Spector. Why? Why a billion dollars for Stem Cell? In an earlier section I propose you fund your ten best researchers; what would that cost at 1 million a year, 10 million dollars and at the end you could evaluate their results. What is wrong with such a trial?

ONLY SPECULATION: certain representatives may be looking at large sums of government monies to go to building (brick and glass) stem cell research centers in their home states and have their names put on them. This is good for their prosperity and also gathering votes by supporting local businesses. Just a question, but if you look at cancer research a lot of the money you donate for research goes into building new buildings and not research, hence enhancing the value of the university they are housed on: prestige, not results.

About looking for research, what do I have to do to get attention? See the email to Former Sec. of HHS, Tommy Thompson who also appeared on the media talking about his wife who had breast cancer and now his daughter too, and how he said he made this a priority while he was at HHS. Really, he never responded to my approaches so it is fair to ask how hard did he work, and does he really care for his family or was he just using them for political leverage? Given how hard I have worked to develop the research and how much I've been kicked, I do believe it is fair to ask these questions.

And what about Canada, and PM Paul Martin, does he REALLY support the fight against cancer/AIDS and stopping new diseases/flues? I have emailed him several times and his Justice Minister; Irwin Cotler (see email section material) but received no replies. Point, emails are considered as legal as courier letters, and when PM Martin was running for re-election he used homophobic emails against his opponents. Why was he able to get these emails but not respond to mine, especially something as serious as the flu pandemic and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? You, the public, should ask him.

About the police, both the US federal (DOJ as represented by Deputy Chief Farrington) and Canadian federal (represented by Comm. Zacardelli) police have failed the public in failing to do their duty to enforce the law. See Dep. Chief Farrington's reply (main menu),"What laws have been broken?" And Comm. Zacardelli does not even have the courage to personally reply even though I made the legal question as simple as possible: Did Douglas Wright knowingly lie for J.C.M.Riley? Is lying for money fraud?

Before continuing, let me make it very clear that no one is asked to support unsubstantiated claims, everything has been documented. And, no one has been asked to support bad science, and to this end I have asked the PM Martin to publicly ask (to prove their own ethical standards):

1.the scientists on the Canadian Stem Cell Ethics Committee to answer the QUESTIONS (I.E., IS RESEARCH DESCRIBED IN DEROGATORY TERMS EXCELLENT, YES OR NO? and is LYING FOR MONEY FRAUD? ETC)
2.the two leading Canadian microbiologists, Drs. Low and Plummer to publicly answer the QUESTIONS.
3.I had asked the US Congress Stem Cell Committee to do the same.
SO FAR NO ONE WILL ACT!

So what can you, the public, do? The ordinary person can not send money, but you can send emails and ask your friends to read the website and then email the government requesting that they deal with these issues because they are important to the public good. Email the President and the Prime Minister.

AND YOU CAN EMAIL

New York Attorney General, Elliot Spitzer, who has a reputation for honesty and going after corporate crime, and ask him to answer publicly the QUESTIONS that no one else has the courage or integrity to do.

The issues are vital to you to ensure that government and science are honest because you may have to depend upon new vaccines if a new flu or other disease arises. Look, if a deadly killer develops and the government acts to save you there may be MANDITORY vaccination of the entire population, and so YOU must demand what you receive up your arm or rump is safe. What if it is not? What if it is just distilled water to keep the public from panicking as they die? What IF??? It all comes down to those SIGNED ASSURANCES I have been fighting about. Now do you see why it is so important to you? whether it is the new stem cell research or the new vaccines, what you must consider is WHISTLE BLOWER PROTECTION because no one in their right mine will speak up after seeing what I have gone through and the public DID NOTHING TO HELP! And this is why I have been black listed and so vigorously opposed by both governments, because if you help me you will be setting very important precedents that will protect society but make it harder for crony politicians to protect cronies. The precedents are:

1. University presidents/CEOs can/will be charged under the criminal code (felony) for the misuse of federal funds.
2.Whstle blower protection will make it harder to cover up after science ' i.e., bad vaccines and bad medicines and bad government officials.

These are all good things that will be in the public good. This is your chance to help and make society a better place. I cannot make these changes without your help. Please help. Thank you.

Edward A. Greenhalgh 21 July 2005

REVISION MENU
1.Pfizer Letter, "I may care more for your children than you do!"
2.RCMP Commissioner Zarcardelli letter and reply
3.RCMP Public Complaints Commission email/letter: Holocaust Denial and the University of Waterloo
4.emails to PM Paul Martin and Justice Min, Irwin Cotler
5.Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Research Proposals
6.Goldman Philanthropic Foundation /Culpepper Biomedical Pilot Project
7.Merck Foundation Research Proposal
8.Howard Hughes Medical Foundation Research Proposal

2006 REVISION: THE GOLD ZONE

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS ( USA AND CANADA ) ALLOW THE VIOLATIONS OF FEDERAL MANDATES AND REGULATIONS SO CRONIES MAY ACHIEVE PRIVATE PERSONAL GAIN AT THE EXPENSE OF THE TAXPAYER, PUBLIC SAFETEY AND THE BETRAYAL OF TRUST.

Keywords: cancer, viruses, stem cells, bird flu, AIDS, TAGGED FOR DEATH, evolutionary danger emerging diseases. The Universities of Waterloo (RIM) and Yale. Bill Gates/Microsoft, Pfizer, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline.Bill Clinton and Monsanto USDA. Mutagens, genetically modified organisms GMOs, environmental stress, Canadian Ministry of Health. The US Health and Human Services (HHS/NIH), Dr.Anthony Faucci.Unethical science, a lack of integrity in the scientific community and collegiality is propaganda for cronyism.

Why they lie. What they gain. What the public loses. How society is endangered.

FACT: U.S Rep. Cunningham (2006) has been given a federal prison sentence and others are under investigation in the Abramoff Lobbying Scandal.

FACT: From the Canadian Gomery Inquiry people have been sentenced for fraud in the misuse of federal money/PROGRAMS .The former Canadian Privacy Commissioner and Former PM Chretiens's speechwriter has been criminally charged for fraud and BREACH OF TRUST!

PROVEN : US and Canadian politicians and people in charge of federal programs do commit crimes and act unethically while betraying the public trust in pursuit of private personal gain and agendas.

The above facts were stated because it is essential for the public to appreciate that federal politicians and bureaucrats do commit crimes (they conspire), making it very believable that they could act (conspire) to block cancer and other research to benefit their own personal private agendas, and so private gain (through the misuse of public office and political connections to public office and public programs). They do not care about you (Joe public/taxpayer) but only themselves and are quite capable, after years of familiarity with political procedure, to misuse public programs for their own ends, performing corrupt and unethical acts, misusing, misdirecting public monies meant for honest research, for private goals, even if it means you could die (proof, the contaminated blood supply). What you must appreciate is that it affects you NOW, and why your help is needed more than ever.

Will the bird flu be the world's big flu pandemic killing millions as in 1919? Even though I have written many people dating back to circa 1992 on the flu as an evolutionary control mechanism, I don't have that answer. However, the REAL danger may be the interaction of the bird flu with the AIDS virus in Africa . Again this theory pre-dates to the early nineties and some of the material is on the website as early research proposals to the major international pharmaceutical companies, like GlaxoSmithKline. Note how many (pharmaceutical companies) don't do basic research in Canada ; and we later learn that they don't even do vaccine research in the US either. Where are the miracles coming from that the new 2006 pharma TV ad says is coming if they don't do basic research in North America ? The theory interrelates the cancer virus and the AIDS virus (same families) and the Mad cow disease family (prions) in a theory called V.T.T. (the Viroid Thermodynamic Theory on the Origin of Life) which states that flues are Evolution's messengers that act to speed up or slow down evolution in response to the ENVIRONMENT'S NEEDS (see Mass Extinction/SARS on the menu of the Green section, its not about SARS but how the destruction of the environment speeds up the effect: pollution and environmental damage causes diseases to alleviate the pressure by killing off the offending species). I am a cancer survivor who used my own research to beat cancer: some of my detractors have died of cancer. Point made, I have put my own life on the line for my research, and my research has repeatedly been proven correct. So much so, people who originally suppressed my work (the University of Waterloo/RIM) have stolen it and used political connections to get away with it. Note how the culture of plagiarism, cronyism and unethical acts cultivated by the University of Waterloo can be reflected to RIM and their patents infringement suits in the US . The University of Waterloo has developed a culture of corruption and intellectual property theft that would make the Asian markets pirates green with envy. Please realize suppressing research receiving US federal monies is a flagrant violation of US Federal Mandates under HHS. It is also a violation of Canadian Federal Mandates: see opening Facts! And because it is proven that both governments have covered up this lying to protect Waterloo and Yale universities, why should you believe your government when it says a vaccine would be safe for you to use? WHY?

THE MOST SIMPLE CASE

VTT states that ALL cancers are viruses: some call them oncogenes, which have a special relationship with all genomes of all living organisms (and is important to understanding evolution and how life evolved). Sounds simple, but the ramifications (control of the signals controls cancer and could do away with most conventional treatments in a very short time) are important and makes a LOT of cancer researchers very jealous and mean spirited because it means that they are no longer the SINGULAR experts. Like spoiled children, they must share their toy, and they DON'T want to! Nobel prize winner, Dr. Kary Mullis has publicly stated that most cancer researchers are lying to keep their high paying jobs. The American Cancer Society is made up of former pharmaceutical company cancer researchers. Neat relationship? Can you understand why I am blacklisted and why you must help if the research is to go forward? I can't overcome the suppression and blacklisting without the public's help.

Another important obvious fact is that both Waterloo and Yale have political and business connections that protect them from the enforcement of the law.

PENN AND TELLER/MISDIRECTION

If you are familiar with the two famous magicians, then you are aware that they constantly tell you that they will DELIBERATELY MISDIRECT your attention so a trick will work. This is what the Canadian federal police (RCMP) did, and to a lesser extent, the FBI.In the previous Red Zone you will see correspondence to the Commissioner of the RCMP, G.Zarcardelli, and how the RCMP investigation is compared to the Holocaust Denial. To criticize a federal police investigation there better be a solid basis; here it is. The RCMP NEVER investigated former President and CEO, Douglas Wright, and former Dean of Science, Biology Chair, Dr. John E. Thompson. This is critical. Instead, they wasted taxpayers' dollars on a phony investigation (secretaries and procedure) in order to create MISDIRECTION. Please be very clear, it is:

• Douglas Wright, and

2.Dr. John E. Thompson

who are being charged/alleged with federal felony of a federal program/money /fraud. Corporate felony. No one else. And, the RCMP never:

1.produced the documents they signed for the J.C.M. Riley NIH federal scholarship, NOR,

2. personally interviewed EITHER of the suspects.

Let me make this perfectly clear: it is as if the federal prosecutors in the World com/ENRON cases only interviewed secretaries and filing clerks, but NEVER spoke with Ebbers(sic), Skilling, nor Lay. Do you understand the effect that would have on the findings (lack of) of the investigation? No charges could be laid. Evers, Skiling, and Lay etc. would never go to court. The RCMP never, I repeat, never, interviewed CEO Douglas Wright, nor Dr. J.E.Thompson. And CEO Wright and Dr.J.E.Thompson both committed federal felony fraud by giving DELIBERATE FALSE SIGNED ASSURANCES. Read the material to the RCMP;over and over I ask them to PROVE that they interviewed CEO Wright and Dr. J.E.Thompson. They have never given the proof but beat around the bush about procedure, you can waste a lot of time with procedure but Wright and Thompson are the main perpetrators. Never have they produced the physical evidence, the NIH/Min. Health documents with their signatures giving SIGNED ASSURANCES that J.C.M.Riley was exceptional and that they were making honest and truthful statements in compliance with the federal regulations. This document proved the federal fraud. Never has the RCMP produced this simple document, but rather the RCMP has engaged in a classic case of MISDIRECTION in order to SHIELD CEO Douglas Wright and Dr. J.E.Thompson. Please review the appropriate material in the Red Zone.

IMPORTANCE: later the research that was lost so Thompson could continue receiving grant money (and the rest of the UW biology department) for research that was obsolete, and then they could plagiarize mine as their own, but more directly here I want you to realize one of the dangers of letting a CEO like Douglas Wright believe he is above the law and can escape justice. You must realize how many business and political connections he had. He was a provincial cabinet minister without (apparently) having to be elected (bought his position through connections and money) which means he was very powerful. And that kind of power must be responsible and accountable if people in our society are to be safe. For specific examples, it is not little mistakes in a laboratory that harms the public. A researcher can speak up and say the quality is bad or we made a bad batch. No, it is the powerful business man with the powerful political connections who is the danger. As in the blood contamination, he can over ride the little scientist on the floor (through threats and intimidation and confidentiality clauses and black listing etc., to destroy his life) and cause the dangerous product, a deadly drug (like a vioxx, or a thalidomide or tainted blood or,..., a bad vaccine) to be marketed for profit and expect to get away with (murder) it because of his many powerful connections. No, we have to expect more from a man like Wright and for the public good, health and safety, this kind of man must be HELD ACCOUNTABLE for his actions. It is in the best interests of society.

The US DOJ and the FBI are equally bad in their cover up to protect Yale. Why protect Yale? So Yale could save face and avoid being sued. At the same time as the Riley scholarship fraud, another American student (without political or wealthy connections) forged his transcripts to get into Yale, where he did very well wining scholarships etc. His only mistake was publicly bragging about it saying Yale wasn't so great and was easy. Yale, to save face, and to get back at him, threatened to charge him with felony fraud unless he gave back the scholarship money etc. etc. Had the Canadian Waterloo/Riley scholarship (official forged transcripts) felony fraud had come to light, Yale would have lost;

• their threat over him

• he then could have sued Yale for a gazillion dollars

• Riley and a Yale professor, Dr.H.R.Behrman would have been exposed for plagiarism (of the E.A.Greenhalgh research).

Hence, the DOJ/FBI covered up and failed to file charges. Neat, huh?

I want all Americans serving in the National Guard in Iraq to savour this for a moment. Your government has threatened Guardsmen with criminal charges (some people in their 60s) if they don't report for duty (maybe multiple tours), but refused to charge a Canadian with felony fraud in order to protect Yale, and suppress research mandated by the federal government (like Cancer and AIDS theories). Think about it for a moment and appreciate it.

Please consider this; many scholarships are simply pre-arranged frauds in order to guarantee some wealthy elite families' children positions: guaranteed jobs for life paid for by the taxpayers. And globalization is sending many university grad jobs offshore and everyone is told to adapt to the market and the times; but not the rich elite who are above the law. But no one guarantees your kids a job for life. Jessica Lynch came from a poor rural community and she had to be shot in the Guard before she could get to go to college to become a teacher. Think about it. This case would expose all of this to the public, which is why I allege the DOJ/FBI refused to lay charges. American public, go to the original website Green section and read the DOJ's (Deputy Chief Farrington) comments,” what crime was committed?” Please email the DOJ and tell them fraud. CEO Wright and Dr. Thompson deliberately lied on federal forms for money that they otherwise would not have received had they told the truth. Lying for federal money from federal programs is federal fraud and there are NO statutes of limitations for federal fraud committed against the federal government. What do you in the National Guard think about that? Why do elite wealthy children deserve jobs guaranteed for life, and yours don't?

CATHOLIC PRIESTS MOLESTING ALTAR BOYS: THE MENTOR MODEL

Please note, before I continue, just how many in the academic community are quite happy and content to accept lies and academic fraud and bad standards. The Endocrinlogical Society of USA must be viewed in the same light as the Catholic Church and how they cover up wrong doing. Academic standards are the backbone to academic integrity, and if scientists are allowed to lie and cheat, then there is no good reason to believe new drugs or vaccines are safe. In fact, lying scientists lend credence to the O.J.Simpson defense about the dna testing. Who do you believe? Why do you believe scientists are telling the truth? I presented the Endocrinological Society of USA with proof of plagiarism by my former supervisor and fraud, and they told me he could not have committed plagiarism nor fraud because he was my mentor. Just like the catholic priests could not have sodomized those young boys because they were their mentors. Wrong. There are bad mentors. There are bad institutions. And there are bad journals. Which explains how dangerous drugs get on the market to kill and cripple people. The South Korean researcher lied about his stem cell miracles. Did Dr. Anthony Faucci of NIH expose him? No! I wrote the NIH with the complaint about NIH fraud etc. Did they do anything? No! The NIH is not protecting the public. NIH and Endocrinology USA act as if the American people are the enemy. Note, 911 could have been avoided; indeed an American agent could have prevented it if he had been helped, but Nooooo, the bureaucracy covered up and hindered him. Just like both governments have fought me. Dr. Faucci may not be competent enough to protect the public. Dr. Faucci is on record as saying that 99.999% of researchers are honest. I don't believe Dr. Faucci was lying, I believe he is incompetent, because journals are developing computer programs to check all submitted photos for doctoring /fraud. Dr. Faucci, like Homeland security is out of touch, and I mention this so the public can see exactly what I have had to deal with.

TAGGED FOR DEATH (A Genetic Marker for the [Bird?] Flu)

Why help me? The research has been so suppressed as to be out of date, so why care? Wrong, my detractors, those black listing and suppressing me are like all criminals; they have to suppress good work in order to hide their awful incompetence. Riley is not the exception; he is the standard that most research is done at today, and why my research is so relevant. You have to understand what was going on politically at the University of Waterloo and their direct connection to government, the pharmaceutical industry, Monsanto, the governments of Canada and USA (USDA) and the Universities of Guelph and Manitoba , plus the Center of Excellence program. Douglas Wright was directly connected to former P.M.Brian Mulroney, whose science minister was the former President of the University of Guelph (an agricultural university that was making a deal with Monsanto). The Ministry of Health had the responsibility for research (then MRC) whose President was Dr.H.G.Friesen former Biology Head from the University of Manitoba (which had connections to Guelph and UW). Dr.Thompson was the Dean of Science/Chair at UW and along with the biology dept. received money for research, which I proved wrong. The whole department was wrong. Besides being on the Riley Ph.D committee he also sat on the M.M.Buhr Ph.D. committee, whose work was the basis for the Riley Ph.D., which I proved wrong in just six months. Because the RCMP refuses to release all the details the following is sketchy (I did ask P.M. Paul Martin for a full public inquiry so the whole truth could be known see accompanying section of emails) but generally accurate. If anyone disagrees, please help me in calling for a FULL PUBLIC INQUIRY and ask the present P.M., Stephen Harper to prove he tells the truth when he says there will be ACCOUNTABILITY IN HIS GOVERNMENT. Riley, whose work was wrong was guaranteed apposition at Yale. Apparently, M.M.Buhr went to the University of Manitoba (Dr.H.G.Friesen's alma mater, hence a reason for him to cover up) before going to the University of Guelph where she was guaranteed a position. All for research that was wrong. Positions for nothing!!!! Please note that during this time period the country held a Royal Commission into Reproductive Research (my field) and found that the researchers were SUBSTANDARD WITH MANY BAD PRACTISES; i.e., venereal diseases in with the sperm samples etc. etc. Bad practices period. And these are the people I had to deal with. Do you understand why they wouldn't want a scientist around who wouldn't lie nor accept bad standards. I have been blacklisted to cover up for bad scientists and bad government.

You also have to be introduced to Dr.Cal Stiller of Western University ( London Ontario ) who also wears many hats as a front for many pharmaceutical agencies promoting the Center of Excellence scheme. He also had former students at the University of Manitoba who controlled a major biology department, and they bought back drug patents from drug companies and used the university to develop these for i.e., cancer. Sounds good, but think about it, they look to see if they can get a 25 to 35 percent improvement in an old discovery while tying up a whole department on development, NOT research of new drugs. Not discovery. My point is I wrote, courier letter with follow up phone call, Dr.Stiller and explained the NEW cancer theories. NO RESPONSE. Allegation, my new research would DISCOUNT (difference from disprove) his former students, and discount the Center of Excellence scheme. Again, basis for black listing. Note all the interconnections so important to black listing.

Back to the University of Guelph , where they were desperate for money, and along comes Monsanto and Genetically Modified crops. Monsanto gives U of G approximately 30 million, which in turn the government of Canada turns around and spends promoting Monsanto GMOs in Asia . Now we have reached the bird flu and TAGGED FOR DEATH theory.

See the Green and Red Sections on emerging diseases and how Monsanto's genetically modified crops may have been responsible for the rise of the bird flu in Asia . Grain is used to feed birds. Is this proof? No. If you are black listed you can't do the research; but if it were to be proven, then Monsanto could be held liable for all the damage caused to the farmers and economy caused by the bird flu. Can't prove what you can't test. Like 911, you won't appreciate it until the planes kill people. Why not try and stop it now? Help me.

The 1919 flu epidemic killed many but where did it come from? Magic? Spontaneous generation? Only if you believe in witch craft. I propose environmental stress. Part of the VTT work. What is a mutagen? Mustard gas is a mutagen. Tons of mustard gas was released in WW1. And other nasty things happened to the environment never fully examined nor appreciated until now. Mutagens from the war caused the outbreak of the killer flu. Proposition not proof. Good science proposes a problem then sets out to experiment. I'm black listed and need your help to carry on, but note, I started this section saying that my work wasn't out dated but relevant to saving your life. Well, what do you think? Relevant.

Look at other flu out breaks in the forties and fifties. The Green Revolution and pesticide misuse: tons of mutagens and environmental stress. Neat relationship. Should be examined. But note more carefully, in light of mad cow, bird flu, GMO crops and animals, we (OURSELVES) are attacking our own food supplies. This is crazy. It is dangerous. See Mass Extinction section in the Green Zone and read about pollution and new diseases.

But TAGGED FOR DEATH? Before going on, please realize that I am condensing long complicated subjects in order to keep your interests. In this short form it is only an outline, not a complete picture. VTT keeps coming back to cancer and AIDS, both viruses compromise the immune system. Bird flu and the 1919 flu do the opposite, they over activate the immune system so the young and healthy die. Quite an environmental culling/control device for an over populated species wouldn't you say. Bird flu can't go deep in the human respiratory tract so some believe it will not have that wide of an effect. Others believe it will mutate to become dangerous. I am not sure it will, but I am looking farther down the road after it intermingles with the African population that has interacted with AIDS. In the Green Section I talk about a new species of man with a changed gene, and babies are born to mothers who had AIDS. In the Red Section you see a gene discussed, a gene that was SHARED by the Black Death (a bacteria) and AIDS (a virus). In each case, approximately, one third of the population was immune and survived the plagues. So you see approximately 70% are susceptible to this genetic marker. Diseases are not parasites etc. etc. they are regulators and controllers and fabricators of evolution. Although individuals die, populations change in response to disease commands. Hence, the bird flu under environmental stress factors is going to interact with this gene marker and approximately one third of the world's population will be immune. Knowing this we can prepare Please note I wrote, CEO McKinnel of Pfizer, and Merck and others, saying there is a new approach to vaccine development, please help me help your families. They didn't help me. Recently I emailed the Canadian P.M.Stephen Harper, and asked him if he was a bad father and was he going to protect his children and explained how Ontario's vaccine had badly failed I the past (see the accompanying section for email). May be some one listened, though they never called back, because over the weekend His Health minister (former Ontario Health Minister at the time of the vaccine trouble) gave a news conference saying antiviral drugs would be available to everyone who needs them. He also said we have some of the best researchers in Canada working on vaccines. These people I would like to test.

Please note I wrote Hoechst Celanese (owner of Connaught Labs which produces many vaccines in Canada ) in the early nineties and explained the VTT work. They said in WRITING that they don't do basic research in Canada . You can check the old research proposals on the website. What gives? I had previously dealt with P.M. Paul Martin, but now lets ask P.M. Steven Harper if he loves his kids and will do everything in his power to protect them. My claim has been against BAD scientists, and I asked Martin to put my claims to the test against my detractors, and two of the leading infectious disease researchers are Drs. Low and Plummer. They are only good if they are capable of telling the truth. And sometimes telling the truth must expose wrongdoing. To stand up for academic standards and scientific integrity. If these two guys can't tell the truth when there is no panic how can you trust them to save you during a crisis? Ask Drs. Low and Plummer to answer, publicly, the question; is research described in derogatory terms excellent, yes, or no? Is lying for money fraud?

Again, these are fair and relevant questions because if it comes down to a bad batch of vaccines (see Canadian history and the shipping of thalidomide and contaminated blood) will they do the right thing? This is a test. After all don't we have 911 emergency drills? Disaster tests? This is a real disaster test, and I think it is very fair. What do you think, after all the lives you save may be your loved ones?

SPECIFIC ILLUSTRATIONS

I would like to share two examples that illustrate exactly what I have been up against for years and why my claims that the researchers are not exactly as wonderful or good as some would have you believe. I wrote the Windsor Cancer Center explaining my research concepts and the support I had and if I could work there if I brought MY OWN RESEARCH FUNDING. Let me repeat that, I would bring my own money to help defeat cancer. My own funding to make cancer history. I also wrote the Federal cabinet minister who also came from Windsor . Do you know what they replied? They were sorry but they had already set their budget and had no room for me and wished me the best. They turned down money for cancer research. How many times has the Cancer Society contacted you asking for money saying they will make cancer history only if you help? How many little kids have turned their piggy banks over to the Cancer Society in a big TV promotion?

I am a cancer survivor, but I can't treat any one because it would be bad science to do so with out the proper testing etc. I am now watching a favorite niece (2006) have a relapse with her cancer. She had conventional treatment a few years ago (chemo and radiation), but now I fear she may die. I have been black listed by some very black-hearted people. What do you think?

The importance about the Windsor Cancer Center is the university of Windsor , and a virus researcher whom I wrote in the early nineties explaining VTT. This was important because she was going to dig up some graves of the 1919 flu epidemic preserved by perma frost. I asked her to take genetic samples because of the genetic component of the VTT work. Did she reply? No. She was too busy fighting it out with her co-workers who were trying to claim all the credit for the research. You would think she would have been sympathetic to my plight and shown concern for the new theory. Obviously, she did not. Her concerns seem to be elsewhere.

My point? My research regarding the flu pandemic has a long history. My theories stand the test of time. My detractors do not look good exposed to the light of day. In fact, they look like a rather bad bunch, don't you agree? I need help. I believe I can do a lot of good for cancer and AIDS research, plus the flu concerns. There is so much more to my research, but none of it can get done with out help. I desperately need help. The black listing has driven me to the edge of personal bankruptcy. What can you do? As an ordinary person you have a mortgage, children to raise and other serious concerns, but you can email people and ask them to read my website. You can help expose the corruption. And there are people out there who have money to clone their pussy cat, or give the Russian s millions of dollars to fly in space: you could ask them to read my website and perhaps give me the funding I asked of Merck/Pfizer so I could do the ground work on the research and prepare all the pathways I need to understand. Please understand, I reviewed all the reference material before starting any work at U of Waterloo, and from that I found all the flaws, who were lying and who was telling the truth. And in six months I was able to prove the entire biology department was working under false assumptions and present them with the correct answers. Unfortunately, they weren't interested in academic truths, but only in prestige and money. This time, dear public, the answers, the truthful answers are more important, they represent your lives. Do you care? If you do you will help.

Thank you.

Edward A.Greenhalgh

15 May 2006

INTRODUCTION TO THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, LETTERS AND EMAIL MATERIALS SENT TO FORMER P.M., PAUL MARTIN, AND THE (THEN) OPPOSITION LEADERS: ABUSES OF SCIENCE BY RICH AND POLITICALLY CONNECTED BUSINESS PEOPLE LEADS TO CRIME AND CIVIL RIGHTS ABUSE

The new P.M. Stephen Harper was asked if he was a bad father regarding the flu pandemic. Much earlier, former P.M. Paul Martin was asked if he was a bad grandpa. Are they doing enough and are the people in the Ministry of Health honest enough to tell the people the truth. Read the material and see what you think.

subject:
flu pandemic and do you love your children, and ACCOUNTABILITY email correction pm harper corection

3May2006
Dear P.M.Harper,

The subject title is serious because the issues are serious such as if the flu pandemic does occur how can you really truthfully be sure the vaccine will be safe?A vaccine could harm not only your own children but all Canadian children as well. Do you Care? Ask your health Minister Mr.Clement about the time he was Ontario's Health Minister and they produced the bad vaccine harming hundreds if not thousands of people. How do you ensure the safety of the vaccine over confidentiality agreements guaranteeing money to crony friends of pharmaceutical companies and bad researchers and bad institutions?You ensure that good people are helped and the Federal mandates are vigorously enforced and the DETERRENT property of the law is used.You are honest and help good people. Do you love your children? I told the former CEO of Pfizer, Mr. McKinnell that I may love his children more than he does. If you don't help me then I may love your children more than you do P.M.Harper.See my website, www.cancerfraudbadbiotech.com and scroll to the Red Zone for the Pfizer material. Please note that during the election campaign I sent you a courier package (only Mr. Layton of the NDP replied) stating the point was to test your commitment to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Do you support the Constitution and the Law? We'll find out. The flu pandemic danger is not from the bird flu itself, but from and interaction with AIDS in Africa, causing a mutation that will literally TAG people for death: it is an evolutionary mechanism, but do you want your kids TAGGED OR ANY Canadian children if it could be avoided? Your call .I need help? Will you help? See my website, and please note I am in the process of revision and you reply or failure will be noted on the site. Do you love your kids? Only you can honestly answer that. Thank you . Edward A. Greenhalgh ph. (519)-579-8320 , and contact info is on the website but you have to scroll down to it.in the Red Zone area NB: recent because computer changed email from pm@pm.gc.ca to PM Paul Martin, I do hopethat you will be a better leader than he was and this is not an omen of the same old cronyism. Computers are tricky and out of respect for your hard fought victory I have corrected the flaw and sent a third email . Apologies. EAG

This section highlights the old argument,” I didn't know.” The most infamous users of this phrase were the WWII Germans who claim no knowledge of the death camps (see the material on Mr.Oberlander who was a Nazi SS Death Squad member now living in Canada and who is being protected by Liberal MP Andrew Telegedi). Most simply, people had their rights stripped away and were reduced to nothing :out of sight and out of mind and no consequences. Science and business were hand in hand in Nazi Germany and great technological progress was made by stripping away rights and liberties. And great harm resulted. Who knew? More importantly, who cares?

The whole point of courier delivered letters is to ensure their delivery so that no one can claim that they never received the material. To this end the material sent to Mr. Jack Layton, leader of the NDP, was acknowledged by his staff whom I received a notice of receipt on Feb.07/2006. You will see that former P.M.Paul Martin had several years of knowing and made no response. Indeed, I had a telephone conversation with a member of his staff who apologized explaining that they had been instructed not to respond to any of my material. I wonder who gave those instructions; perhaps it was the same person who considered that Parents would waste a government grant for their children's day care on popcorn and beer? What the public must be aware is that leaders (whether Canadian (Tainted Blood Scandal) or American (FEMA/Hurricane Katrina) or European (UK agricultural scientific policy spreading Mad Cow disease harming the beef industry)) must make informed wise decisions. They must be CONSCIOUSLY aware and use the resources TRUTHFULLY available to them to protect your lives. For anyone to use the excuse”I didn't know” is not only unacceptable, it could be criminal: you could die.

Scientific principle demands that a theory be put forward and tested. The University of Waterloo is NOT a scientific center because they had a very simple and easy test to measure and settle the dispute. They chose not, proving that they weren't GOOD scientists. The University of Waterloo also had the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as measurement of fairness and justice, but they chose not to use it because they (the Board of Governors) are bad people and bad citizens! The Charter GUARANTEES any Canadian of ability and merit the right to education and employment. The University of Waterloo, and its ELITIST President Douglas Wright decided they were above the law and the Canadian constitution. And any country that will strip away the rights of its citizens is prepared to allow other bad things to happen. Please read the material presented to the various politicians and be aware of its time frame as it may well surprise you.

Edward A. Greenhalgh 8 Feb. 06

I originally finished this section in February, it is now May 2006 and Prime Minister Stephen Harper won the election. I emailed his office 03 May 2006 and followed up with a telephone call a few days later to confirm its receipt. P.M. Harper has PROMISED the public a government of ACCOUNTABILITY with protection for whistleblowers. He has also set aside one billion dollars for the flu pandemic. In my email I asked him if he was a bad father and if he loved his kids. Read the enclosed /following email and decide what you think his response should be. If he makes a response I will post it. What would you do if you were Prime Minister? President Bush, whom I have previously emailed? In light of my research theory, VTT, dating back to the early 90s and noting flu pandemics then, it comments on the GENETIC Basis for the concept that people (like you) may be TAGGED for DEATH (see main text of revision for details) and how all of my research has been vindicated while the University of Waterloo has been discredited. Wouldn't you want to help the research save your kids if you were PM? President? Email them (PM Harper and Pres. Bush) for a response. Email your friends and ask them for their opinions. Read the following material in order of presentation, but be aware of who knew what when, and who did nothing. Thank you. Edward A. Greenhalgh 8 May 2006

Click here to continue Article...